I actually ran Gnome 3 Shell + extensions. I switched to mate because of the insane memory requirements not being able to work on my Ancient Radeon 9600 with 64 MiB ram. I do have to say, with the right extensions, it works really well.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
RHEL 7 Linux To Use GNOME 3 Classic Mode
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by BO$$ View PostHallelujah! It's obvious this mantra of letting the employees do whatever they want doesn't work. The execs must have a coherent vision and the programmers must execute. Not let programmers run around because even if most of them may be good programmers, they suck at having anything related to a vision. Sounds cruel but most people don't have good ideas no matter how good are at their job.Last edited by erendorn; 14 June 2013, 10:39 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Honton View PostLet us assume the extra maintenance cost is insignificant. Why did no one show up to do the work? I think it is very understandable that the existing maintainers did some adjustments in order to keep the workload low and predictable. Anyway I know some of the missing features might be coming back. And that is with a vengeance. Opacity for every app, cool snapping to mimic panes for every app.
What it is, is the gnome way.... copy apple. Ever wonder why gnome3+ menus look just like apple? Its because gnome are morons.
Comment
-
Originally posted by uid313 View PostWill they be using the GNOME Classic Session which has deprecated by GNOME, or will they use GNOME Shell with the new classic extensions?
Either way, I am a fan of Classic Session, and not found of gnome-shell at all.
I hope Red Hat makes it great.
The thing that existed prior to 3.8 was never called 'classic'. It was called 'fallback mode'. 'Classic Mode' is the new thing in 3.8 that replaces fallback mode. It did not exist prior to 3.8. That is what RHEL 7 is using, *not* 'fallback mode'.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chaz View PostSo, it was Red Hat devs who led the way on the new interface in Shell in the first place, right? Why is Red Hat paying people to develop something they don't actually want to use?
Comment
Comment