Ubuntu 24.04 Boosts Performance, Outperforming Windows 11 On The AMD Ryzen Framework 16 Laptop

[t1r0nama]

The slowest of them all (linux) is faster then the latest and greatest windows. That is quiet of an achievement for a company worth 3 trillion dollars LOL

It's time for microsoft to switch to linux kernel. Do not make same mistake again. ARM era is coming and you are trying to port this crappy code of yours to it and continue whatever hell you were doing last decades? Windows will fail and it will fail epically.

[Weasel]

But aren't you ashamed that Linux, after 30 years of development, still has problems with stability and GUI quality?

Linux is rock solid.

GUI quality is good enough if you know what to choose. GNOME is an atrocity, but then again so is Windows GUI nowadays since Windows 8 and up. So what's your point?

Linux suffers from userland being a mess of a platform without backwards compatibility and a million breaking changes. But that can be alleviated with Wine which also runs your Windows apps so...


Of course you still get the occasional breakage on an update or regression, but same with Windows? If not even more on Windows. Except on Linux it's stupid easy to revert.

[HEL88]

Aren't you ashamed you must pay for this crap?

Let's take a look at the Linux kernel:
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerabi...c-1/Linux.html

This year alone 220 vulnerabilities were patched in the Linux kernel. That comes out to two vulnerabilities a day ONLY in the KERNEL - yes, 60 vulnerabilities per month in only kernel!

How about KDE?
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerabi...id-77/KDE.html

160 vulnerabilities in 2024 alone.

How about GNOME:
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerabi...283/Gnome.html

260 vulnerabilities only in 2024.

And the rest of the system components?

The moral of this is that Linux is full of vulnerabilities Much more than Windows.

In addition, the Widnows desktop is also much more stable, so it is the basis for desktops in corporations, work on it, lawyers, managers, board of directors, CEO. And not on Linux. And the fact that it is a little slower is not a problem. Because more important is the stability and quality of the desktop.

As if Linux on desktop was better then companies would have switched to it long ago. But it isn't. Companies would rather spend a bunch of money on a license than fight with Linux.

Linux works well on servers. Where it has well-paid administrators and where care 24/7 like in intensive care.

[HEL88]

Windows evolved from DOS toy OS.(....).

P.S. if Windows wasn't such monolith and had good commit history it would be in better situation, but still it evolved from DOS.

You write that Windows originated from DOS and such lies, only pass here - among Linux fanboys. Everyone knows that Windows originated from VMS, actually the MICA project from DEC. KernelNT and Win32 have nothing to do with DOS.


Why do you write such nonsense? What makes you write lies? Frustration??? Are you a storyteller by character?

[HEL88]

MAC on Windows: 2007

MAC on Linux: 2000

So WTF you're talking here about?

Yes in the past linux was faster to implement modern security.

But now Windows has come out on top and introduced security features that Linux can only dream about for now.

Now Linux is behind Windows - this is a fact.

[duby229]

Let's take a look at the Linux kernel:
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerabi...c-1/Linux.html

This year alone 220 vulnerabilities were patched in the Linux kernel. That comes out to two vulnerabilities a day ONLY in the KERNEL - yes, 60 vulnerabilities per month in only kernel!

How about KDE?
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerabi...id-77/KDE.html

160 vulnerabilities in 2024 alone.

How about GNOME:
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerabi...283/Gnome.html

260 vulnerabilities only in 2024.

And the rest of the system components?

The moral of this is that Linux is full of vulnerabilities Much more than Windows.

You're joking right?

Linux and open source projects have bug reporting portals for a very good reason. The lack of publicly available bug reporting portals and bug reports doesn't make Windows better. In fact it makes it far worse. You literally just spouted one of the most retarded oxymorons you could possibly have made.

Just because you can find bug reports for Linux and open source projects and you can't find them for windows doesn't make windows better.

[duby229]

Unapproved post, I used a word that flagged it....

Anyway, dumbest oxymoron ever ^^^

EDIT: A lack of bug reporting portals and bug reports does not equal a lack of bugs. In fact all the bug reporting portals and bug reports is a GOOD thing... The fact that you can find these bug reports and post them here is one of the things that most definitely make Linux and its ecosystem FAR better than windows.,,

[HEL88]

Linux is rock solid.

GUI quality is good enough if you know what to choose. GNOME is an atrocity, but then again so is Windows GUI nowadays since Windows 8 and up. So what's your point?

Linux suffers from userland being a mess of a platform without backwards compatibility and a million breaking changes. But that can be alleviated with Wine which also runs your Windows apps so...

Pick one.

[OmniNegro]

To those who would pretend that MS not admitting they have as many if not far, far more bugs... Linux is happy to have bug reports. See these reports are required to do something Windoze is horribly bad at. Fixing bugs.

Linux knows bugs exist. Freely admits they exist, and seeks input to help them target, identify and remedy those bugs. Windoze does some of this, but they are simply not even remotely honest about it. If you want to believe otherwise, feel free. But do not pretend they are better because they want you to think they are.

[mSparks]

MSFT market cap as of April 18th 2024 : 3.003 Trillion dollars ( = 3003 Billions dollars, 3 003 000 000 000 dollars ).

So yes, I mean it, TRILLIONS with a S of dollars.

PS: your plan makes no sense, why would they start with external opensource code bases, they could simply clean up their own, ditching things from the past without relying on adopting bsd. Same for the UI, they made their own toolkit. What they need is to ditch retro compatibility and crappy bad habits for their next Windows and start clean for real. They all they need for it, it's more a matter of want then can.

You forgot to consider a lot of the costs to the companies who used windows. MS and their dependants will have burnt through all that several times over even once you exclude the majority of 2024 MS value which has nothing to do with windows (80% or smth of that market cap comes from linkedin, azure and office)

windows is basically abandonware at this point.