I'm now waiting on Glorious Eggroll (GE) to release Nobara 38 based on Nobara 37.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fedora 38 Released With GNOME 44 Desktop, GCC 13, Many New Features
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by FireBurn View PostWow they're using GCC 13 even before it's released
Comment
-
Upgraded. Went as expected - no issues. Someone mentioned that the wallpaper is ugly. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder right? So hideous is thus also in the eye of the beholder as well. Ick, it's hideous. When the only issue noted with the release is ugly wallpaper it's clear they've done an awesome job. For the last few releases I've had some funky issues with Pipewire that I needed to fix after upgrading. Those were gone with this release - it went perfectly. Sorry to the artist that created that wallpaper but it's ugly. To me anyway - taste varies.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vermilion View Post
Does Fedora replace Cantarell with Noto in GNOME UI? Or is it used somewhere else?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
a friend with working nvidia on f37 was saying something like failing or not attempting to load nvidia driver after upgrade
Originally posted by andyprough View PostIs it snarky and non-factual to say that I'm still staring at a blank homepage, with all their javascript enabled? I understand that it probably works OK with Chrome, but this is truly moronic.
https://gitlab.com/fedora/websites-a...a-websites-3.0 looks like the effort was here, also they may have learned a lesson or previously forgotten to press a fallback option, now the site actually contains the rest of the html to load without js with only a few things missing (the top popout menus most glaring), this also means SEO exists again because search engine crawlers dont use js either
Originally posted by Vermilion View PostDoes Fedora replace Cantarell with Noto in GNOME UI? Or is it used somewhere else?
Originally posted by Farmer View PostBeauty is in the eye of the beholder right?
our brains are generally hardwired to an extent, contrast/saturation is usually attractive (in a primal way at least), color theory is real, our eyes enjoy following guidelines and focal points, works dont exist in a vacuum with nothing to compare to, digital painting techniques and tools have changed/improved over the years so the generally accepted quality bar has also raised
rules and principles can be bent or broken of course, i've heard a saying 'good design is intentional design', ironic or anti art is still a form of art
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wallpapers most look pretty poor quality/amateur skill/like they used basic open source tools
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianDesktop/Artwork debian's overall seem more suitable for actual desktop computing
guess it's time for me to make submissions for these and other distros (but there's a conflict of usability for desktop and phone screen icon users, a bright busy wallpaper makes icons and labels hard to read)
Comment
Comment