Originally posted by rhavenn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fedora 38 Released With GNOME 44 Desktop, GCC 13, Many New Features
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by rene View Post
thanks, I was already alive and had to endure that :-/
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by andyprough View PostI wonder what is up with the Fedora website? I'm just getting a blank page. Are they trying to use some super-slick new web technology that doesn't actually work?
Update: Yes, indeed they are. Download page works though. Bunch of geniuses, too smart for their own good.
of course i prefer static js-disabled graceful fallbacks, yes it's a dumb omission to not display a simple message, yes i'm wondering why there is no <meta description>, but snarky comments arent facts nor are they being sent to the fedora team
Originally posted by rene View Postsure, but normal^W professional people would wait the full release engineering Q/A process and build everything with at least a somewhat peer reviewed final release ;-)
it's final enough and it can/will be updated, holding off for 6 months would be stupid when clearly red hat is working on both the compiler and the distro (which needs to be distro packages reviewed, not peer reviewed for all random independent code)
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by kn00tcn View Postof course i prefer static js-disabled graceful fallbacks, yes it's a dumb omission to not display a simple message, yes i'm wondering why there is no <meta description>, but snarky comments arent facts nor are they being sent to the fedora team
Comment
-
Originally posted by kn00tcn View Postit does work, javascript frameworks are not new, technically bandwidth and server cpu processing is saved by not generating out entire redundant verbose html code to visitors, it looks like the top menu is quite the list of items, it looks like there is a light/dark theme detector and toggle
of course i prefer static js-disabled graceful fallbacks, yes it's a dumb omission to not display a simple message, yes i'm wondering why there is no <meta description>, but snarky comments arent facts nor are they being sent to the fedora team
"Jakub Jelinek of Red Hat's compiler team announced today they have worked their way down to no P1 regressions and as such have now made "gcc-13-branch" for the GCC 13 codebase while GCC Git with its mainline code is tracking development for what will be GCC 14"
it's final enough and it can/will be updated, holding off for 6 months would be stupid when clearly red hat is working on both the compiler and the distro (which needs to be distro packages reviewed, not peer reviewed for all random independent code)
Comment
-
Originally posted by avis View Post
Amazing you're saying that instead of apologizing. I've known Open Source fans are hostile towards non-open source things, I've know realized they are simply hostile. Open Source must be a religion considering what it does to people.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment