Originally posted by elatllat
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Debian Begins A General Resolution To Decide What To Do With Non-Free Firmware
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by hotaru View Posta better option would be to actually work on developing free firmware instead of wasting so much effort on handwringing over non-free firmware.
but at least Debian doesn't go out of their way to make development of free firmware more difficult like the FSF does.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by rleigh View Post
The GPL does not have any effect on the "hardware support with their media" as you said it. That's not the GPL. It's not a licensing issue. That's a deliberate choice by the distributor to implement that restriction. The GPL can not preclude the distribution of third-party non-GPL kernel modules on the installation media. That is completely outside its bounds, and explicitly stated in the licence. That's a distributor choice. Plenty of other distributions make the opposite choice, and it's still all perfectly legal.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hotaru View Posta better option would be to actually work on developing free firmware instead of wasting so much effort on handwringing over non-free firmware.
but at least Debian doesn't go out of their way to make development of free firmware more difficult like the FSF does.
we need to develop free hardware chips from the start one like libre-socs...Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia
Comment
-
As to why firmware is not shipped with hardware - I imagine most devices need RAM for their operation and with uploadable firmware they don't need additional persistent memory chip for the firmware. It's uploaded into the same RAM that they need for operation.
But then, by refusing to distribute said firmware, a distro puts such devices at a disadvantage without gaining anything. Sure, some warning at different stages - installation and/or boot time, might make people aware of the issues. But what they get now is disfunctional hardware. It's a self inflicted wound on the part of the distro.
I switched from Debian to Ubuntu when on my new (circa 2008) PC the Debian installer didin't find the network chip (I think Atheros but may have been Broadcom). With Ubuntu installer it just worked. I used to always use the minimal installer which downloads everything from the net so it was a show-stopper.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by SilverFox
Mesa gets installed, Unfortunately, For amd cards You still need firmware-amd-graphics package for the full caboodle, otherwise it's modesetting from grub to get into desktop.
Comment
-
I think they should leave the non-free firmware out for the free ISO (the way it is now) and make the "official unofficial" non-free ISO be "official official" (just like the free ISO) and have it be side-by-side with the free ISO, instead of making it harder to find. And, there should also be an explanation to guide the user to make their choice (without nudging them in either direction without an explanation).
So, in other words, I think they should keep the ISO files as they are, but improve the website's structure (and make the non-free ISO also be considered "official official" in addition to the "official official" free ISO).
Edit:
Having just checked the website (instead of thinking about it from memory), the non-free ISO is not so hard to find, but the website's structure can still be improved. And, they should also label it as official.
So, something like "If you're at least a bit of a software purist, you'll probably want to download this. If you're a newbie, you'll probably want to download that."
Edit #2:
For what it's worth, I'm somewhat of a software purist, and it's one of the reasons I chose Debian all those years ago, so I really hope they don't remove the fully-free ISO.Last edited by s8as8a; 31 August 2022, 04:43 AM.
Comment
Comment