Some Fedora Users Concerned GNOME Software Promotes Proprietary Software With Flathub

[Vistaus]

So if you enable a proprietary software repository, sometimes proprietary software is displayed in the software center?

Working as designed, user error.

Or in nerd speak: PEBKAC.

[royce]

I am absolutely OK to use certain commercial software packages that aren't open source as these are far superior to the open source equivalents to aid me on my day job. For instance, certain Jetbrains IDEs.

I'm thankful also for all the open source stack that allows me to deliver software. And the fact I can use one to deliver the other.

The world is a nicer place when you don't have to deal with unwanted proselytism.

[Spooktra]

This right here is why Linux barely registers as a blip on the desktop; the idiotic ideology is idiotic.

Like most liberal, commie, hippie douches, these people are incapable of having a rational thought. People are supposed to go to school, spend their time and money studying and getting a degree, so that they can then turn around and give away the product they produce for free.

It's the same stupid shit with those that want free education, free medical care, free willy; teachers and doctors are supposed to work for free, despite spending years studying, because reasons.

But I guarantee you that if someone told these people that want free software, free education, free medical care that they would not be getting a paycheck this week they would have a fit.

[bregma]

"Some" community members "expressed concern" that non-Free third-party software can be made available when the owner of the machine goes out of their way to enable a source that makes such software available. Nothing is going to be done about it.

Must be a desperately slow news day to post a headline that effectively says "things are working as designed and there is someone on the internet who is dissatisfied".

[Danny3]

Promoting proprietary software is irresponsible and risky for the users.
I think it would be easier for everyone if they at least would highlight proprietary software with a red color and open source one with a green color and add some tooltips to explain why.

[Britoid]

This is stupid, you can clearly see when you go to Flathub.org there is proprietary software there and you're adding it as a source, GNOME Software is doing what you told it to do.

If you're going to have this attitude, remove snapd from the Fedora repositories, otherwise this is reeking of hypocrisy when there's literally a package in the Fedora repos that actively promotes proprietary software (dnf doesn't warn you either). As a comparison Flathub isn't in the Fedora repos because it enables proprietary software.

[Volta]

They better fix their web browsers to support videos on YouTube and Netflix. It works on Ubuntu, but on Fedora some codecs were missing on YouTube.

[Shiba]

Want to attract new users to Linux or not?

Or not.

[Black_Fox]

Everyone has an opinion but fails to remember or care that Fedora by default installs no proprietary software and has no access to such software without adding extra repositories.

Exactly. Flathub is another of those extra repositories which aren't there by default.

[R41N3R]

Proprietary software should not be promoted at all, there should be a clear warning that the code cannot be audited. Not every user is educated enough to always check and understand the licence before installing such software. The risk of installing software that is tracking users of does other malicious things is quite high. Just look at how users are enforced now to install proprietary banking apps that contain trackers on Android. This is unacceptable and shouldn't be promoted by an app store! F-droid does state clear warning, this should be used as a good example.