Originally posted by dh04000
View Post
Originally posted by dh04000
View Post
I think C++ is superior in anyway and makes crash-resistant applications is pretty much what this sounds like. They could've rewritten a better maintained version in C and it would probably still be better than the older code base of the time, if it's as bad as you say but you specifically said C++ as if it's just an all-around superior language in every damn way.
Why? Why even bring up that C++ was used? The only fair point was that the 0.8.xx version was unmaintained but that still doesn't take into account the amount of time it would take for the new maintainer to become familiar with a newer code base, whether he even knows C++ [similar enough languages, but different enough due to the addition of classes, new datatypes like auto, introduced in C++11, the fact that everything you can do in C can't be done in C++,incomplete datatypes are allowed in C-arrays but not C++ in most standard implementations, templates, and the entire C++ Standard Library], maybe he even has a technical reason for his interest in the older code base beyond familiarity or he just WANTS to do this. This isn't a business it is OSS.
Comment