Originally posted by Zhick
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Google Opens Up VP8, Launches New Container Format
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by deanjo View PostYou think they would have done that with Google Talk and Google Book search as well don't you? Didn't work out so nice and clean there now did it?
Sure they are, and how long did that take to get to that point?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Remco View Post8 years, and ongoing. Considering that crappy-implemented-VP8 already compares well with H.264 baseline, what will VP8 look like after more than 8 years of improvement?
I'm reluctant to take the source from the x264 dev homepage, but that one looked like shit.
http://doom10.org/compare/xvid.png <-- I'd say it's pretty close to xvid.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MicketActually.. how well DOES it compare?
I'm reluctant to take the source from the x264 dev homepage, but that one looked like shit.
http://doom10.org/compare/xvid.png <-- I'd say it's pretty close to xvid.
http://doom10.org/compare/x264baseline.png
I don't know the affiliations of these guys and I guess they only used baseline, but here there is another data point:
Comment
-
Originally posted by XorEaxEax View PostYes, but we all know that from that day on we will have to pay if h.264 is the standard web video format. The whole idea behind mpegla is to corner the market for video so as to be the only game in town and then profit handsomely from licencing fees. Hulu and Netflix are not the targets of vp8 since they likely have strong ties to many companies in the mpeg la patent pool. But they are also not particularly important in the success or failure of a video codec. There's still a huge amount of sites hosting videos and this will just continue to grow. And these sites will likely see vp8 as the most attractive choice given that h.264 licence fees will kick in for them either immediately if they are a pay to view or in 5 years even if they are free.
DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--MPEG LA announced today that its AVC Patent Portfolio License will continue not to charge royalties for Internet Video that is free to end users (known as “Internet Broadcast AVC Video”) during the entire life of this License. MPEG LA previously announced it would not charge royalties for such video through December 31, 2015 (see http://www.mpegla.com/Lists/MPEG%20LA%20News%20List/Attachments/226/n-10-02-02.pdf), and today’s announcement makes clear that royalties will continue not to be charged for such video beyond that time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by benmoran View PostFree for end users.
The end user still must pay for the encoder that creates the videos and for the decoder to watch them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by spiritofreason View PostFor end users? Unless I'm reading something wrong, that's not true. It's free for whomever is serving AVC videos on the web for free (which may not include services that include advertisements).
The end user still must pay for the encoder that creates the videos and for the decoder to watch them.
Comment
Comment