Tweet
In my opinion Plasma 6 wasn't ready although Wayland run almost flawless on Plasma 5. Plasma 6 wasn't ready for all users at least. As end-user I would like to suggest a checking program to analyze the current packages the specific Os based on KDe Palsma has in order to integrate properly the new packages to install and replace... if something is missed it must be reinstalled together with the new packages.
I understand that many had expectations, but if a product is not full ready it is good to wait in my opinion. I don't know if KDe Neon be the right method to make experiments so to improve Plasma because end-user is not a laboratory rat. End-user can accept to be a laboratory rat if it is payed to act as a rat of laboratory.... so how to finance a project if it is necessary to be payed for that project?
Now, I read that Kubuntu will be proposed with Plasma 5.27 and I understand the reason.
The strategic mistake is that KDe Neon is the main reason enthusiasts could be motivated to support KDe team... I know about those fucking bugs, but bugs cannot be a reason to generate relations with enthusiasts. The way to generate relations is the motivation, however a problematic proposal is demotivating if not frustrating. So how to solve this conflict? My opinion is that KDe Neon must be used only for test proposals by the developers. Then, if this DE applied in several Linux operating systems is able to improve assuring the sufficient reliability, well done, otherwise as many project has an end, KDe Plasma project ends too.
Sincerely, after the good experience provided by Plasma 5 as end-user I cannot imagine Plasma 6 were so mediocre, unreliable and sometimes unusable too. I know that it is the beginning, but end-user cannot accept a similar result.
So, the first consequence is that I have no motivation in financing this kind of project, unlike what I was going to make. The second consequence is that I'll move to Kubuntu 24.04 in April, since I have been used to Plasma for years. I'm not going to wait for Plasma 7 (sarcasm). So I'll evaluate Kubuntu 24.04 during its utilization and I'll abandon Plasma definitely in case my experience worsens for any also stupid reason.
I understand that many had expectations, but if a product is not full ready it is good to wait in my opinion. I don't know if KDe Neon be the right method to make experiments so to improve Plasma because end-user is not a laboratory rat. End-user can accept to be a laboratory rat if it is payed to act as a rat of laboratory.... so how to finance a project if it is necessary to be payed for that project?
Now, I read that Kubuntu will be proposed with Plasma 5.27 and I understand the reason.
The strategic mistake is that KDe Neon is the main reason enthusiasts could be motivated to support KDe team... I know about those fucking bugs, but bugs cannot be a reason to generate relations with enthusiasts. The way to generate relations is the motivation, however a problematic proposal is demotivating if not frustrating. So how to solve this conflict? My opinion is that KDe Neon must be used only for test proposals by the developers. Then, if this DE applied in several Linux operating systems is able to improve assuring the sufficient reliability, well done, otherwise as many project has an end, KDe Plasma project ends too.
Sincerely, after the good experience provided by Plasma 5 as end-user I cannot imagine Plasma 6 were so mediocre, unreliable and sometimes unusable too. I know that it is the beginning, but end-user cannot accept a similar result.
So, the first consequence is that I have no motivation in financing this kind of project, unlike what I was going to make. The second consequence is that I'll move to Kubuntu 24.04 in April, since I have been used to Plasma for years. I'm not going to wait for Plasma 7 (sarcasm). So I'll evaluate Kubuntu 24.04 during its utilization and I'll abandon Plasma definitely in case my experience worsens for any also stupid reason.
Comment