Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WebKitGTK Moving To Skia For 2D Rendering To Yield Better Performance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • WebKitGTK Moving To Skia For 2D Rendering To Yield Better Performance

    Phoronix: WebKitGTK Moving To Skia For 2D Rendering To Yield Better Performance

    WebKitGTK as the port of the WebKit rendering engine used by GNOME Web (Epipahny) and other software for displaying web content is transitioning to using Skia for its 2D rendering...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Well of course it's faster since Cairo lost it's accelerated backends!

    Comment


    • #3
      anyone uses gnome web?

      Comment


      • #4
        That are good news for apps on Linux using system WebView for UIs instead of bloated Electron.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by s_j_newbury View Post
          Well of course it's faster since Cairo lost it's accelerated backends!
          AFAIK they mostly didnt work.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by s_j_newbury View Post
            Well of course it's faster since Cairo lost it's accelerated backends!
            AFAIK they mostly didnt work.
            Exactly, Cairo`s accelerated backends never worked really well - for many workloads they were actually slower than software-rendering, not to mention correctness bugs.
            It seems everybody who can is running (or ran long ago) away from Cairo - for good reasons.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by andre30correia View Post
              anyone uses gnome web?
              Even GNOME has it's own Internet Explorer

              Comment


              • #8
                I don't get it why GNOME keeps pushing it's users just towards WebKit. It sucks in 2024. Why not use Blink (or even Gecko) instead (or simultaneously)?
                I understand the ambition behind their browser... but not with that obsolete and slow engine.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by StarterX4 View Post
                  I don't get it why GNOME keeps pushing it's users just towards WebKit. It sucks in 2024. Why not use Blink (or even Gecko) instead (or simultaneously)?
                  I understand the ambition behind their browser... but not with that obsolete and slow engine.
                  This "obsolete" engine, as you put it, powers the browser with the second-highest market share worldwide.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by pbryan View Post

                    This "obsolete" engine, as you put it, powers the browser with the second-highest market share worldwide.
                    Because of anti-competitive practices.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X