This is almost a joke at this point!!!
People have been claiming for years that open source is supposedly superior because bugs and vulnerabilities are found and fixed fast, but you have curl with a 2 year old vulnerability, this thing with an 8 year old bug, that other thing with a 35 year old vulnerability, Gnome had a memory leak for 10 years, the list goes on.
My question to the Linux faithful is this, after all these bugs that have existed for years have come to light, how can you still propagate the myth that open source is superior?
People have been claiming for years that open source is supposedly superior because bugs and vulnerabilities are found and fixed fast, but you have curl with a 2 year old vulnerability, this thing with an 8 year old bug, that other thing with a 35 year old vulnerability, Gnome had a memory leak for 10 years, the list goes on.
My question to the Linux faithful is this, after all these bugs that have existed for years have come to light, how can you still propagate the myth that open source is superior?
Comment