I wonder whether there's some GitLab functionality they needed or they just moved to spite Microsoft. Not that it matters now that it's a done deal.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
KDE Completes Transition To GitLab For Developer Portal
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by bug77 View PostI wonder whether there's some GitLab functionality they needed or they just moved to spite Microsoft. Not that it matters now that it's a done deal.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cochise View Post
GitHub is closed source and not self hostable. KDE have a GitHub mirror, and it will continue, but used cgit + Phabricator + Bugzilla. GitLab is intended as cgit + Phabricator replacement.
There: https://enterprise.github.com/faq
Comment
-
Originally posted by bug77 View PostGitHub is most definitely "self hostable". I've used it as such.
There: https://enterprise.github.com/faq
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by cochise View PostWell, I'm wrong here. But is closed source, and KDE don't use closed source software. They even refused to ask for enterprise version of GitLab, and are using the community version.
Open source makes even less sense if they're not hosting it themselves, it means they're not changing/improving the code base anyway.
So no, I don't think the license was what swung their decision.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bug77 View PostSo no, I don't think the license was what swung their decision.
why KDE won't apply for gitlab gold/ultimate as a opensource software group?
As a matter of community policy, KDE only makes use of freely licensed software. As it requires a license, this excludes the Enterprise Edition versions of Gitlab.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by cochise View Post
Not the way'd I'd make the same decision, but I have no say in what KDE does.
Also GitLab is a good choice, I was just interested how it compares technically to GitHub. Apparently that wasn't (much of) a factor.
Comment
Comment