Originally posted by ezst036
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Firefox 64.0 Released
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by TemplarGR View PostYeah, it is great, that way you can feel proud you are using a bad fork because you are too inept to install the real deal...
I am only attempting to give credit where credit is due. This isn't the first time the Manjaro devs have released important packages before Arch. Things like this show they care about taking care of vulnerabilities in a timely manner, as opposed to just waiting for it to come from upstream.
Both the Arch devs and Manjaro devs do an excellent job of providing good systems to use. And, of course, Manjaro wouldn't be the system it is without Arch.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by lectrode View Post
You are welcome to your opinion. I'd like to clarify that I do not hold Arch in contempt; on the contrary I use it on my raspberry pi as well as a couple headless virtual servers. No one is disputing that it is upstream for Manjaro either.
I am only attempting to give credit where credit is due. This isn't the first time the Manjaro devs have released important packages before Arch. Things like this show they care about taking care of vulnerabilities in a timely manner, as opposed to just waiting for it to come from upstream.
Both the Arch devs and Manjaro devs do an excellent job of providing good systems to use. And, of course, Manjaro wouldn't be the system it is without Arch.
I disagree that Firefox is an "important package". It is NOT. It is a browser. You can use another while you are waiting for an update. You can even update it yourself. You can just use ABS, get the script, and make the package yourself, while you are waiting for the official release. 90% of the time updating a package yourself is as simple as just increasing the version numbers in the PKGBUILD and changing the hash of the download (or just using --skipinteg).
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by TemplarGR View Post
Anyone knows why? What is the major problem with the open source drivers that browsers like Firefox and Chromium can't work?
Originally posted by dungeon View Post
For which SBC you want that?Last edited by juno; 12 December 2018, 06:02 AM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Firefox does still not support:- Wayland (Bug 635134 (wayland) Firefox Wayland port), but Nightly has code for it, so its getting there.
- https://caniuse.com/#feat=dialog - The <dialog> element (code exists, but it is disabled behind a config flag)
- https://caniuse.com/#feat=input-datetime - The 'date' and 'time' is supported, but not 'datetime-local', 'month' and 'week'.
- https://caniuse.com/#feat=font-family-system-ui - The 'system-ui' CSS font-family for platform native font.
- F12 Developer Tools does not support debugging of WebSockets and Server-Sent Events.
Last edited by uid313; 12 December 2018, 06:25 AM.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by juno View PostThe lack of manpower/interest of Mozilla and Google.
"Walled garden" Linux forks where hardware and GPU drivers are strictly controlled (Android, ChromeOS) - GPU acceleration is not an issue.
Example from my PC (Fedora on Intel Core i7-6700K + proprietary driver for GeForce 1070):
Firefox acceleration by default is disabled, but it could be enabled manually.
Scenario 1: iGPU Multi-Monitor manually disabled in BIOS; nVidia as primary GPU (so Intel GPU is disabled)
No issues with Firefox acceleration - all is working OK.
Scenario 2: iGPU Multi-Monitor enabled (default BIOS setting); nVidia as primary GPU (but Intel GPU is also available)
Firefox with acceleration looks to work OK - even 4K videos, until... going full screen... On full screen video is freezing...
Workaround 1: Sleep PC and wake it up... I have no idea why, but after that video acceleration is working OK even on full screen.
Workaround 2: Open weird Gnome internal terminal (Alt+F2 lg) and run command: Meta.disable_unredirect_for_screen(global.screen)
I do not use Intel GPU anyway, so for me Scenario 1 where Intel GPU is disabled is OK.
But as general setting for every Linux user - sadly but as for today acceleration really should be disabled by default (at least if Firefox recognise my specific configuration).
PS. Yes, I know that people that are using proprietary drivers in Linux should know that it is very bad idea and there will be consequences... It is true and in perfect world majority of Linux enthusiasts should avoid proprietary products like nVidia GeForce... But reality is that many Linux users have nVidia, so they cannot be ignored (for example many reports on https://www.protondb.com/ are from nVidia users).
PS2. Of course my next GPU will not be nVidia.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charlie68 View Post
I imagine how much has been tested! I also like to have the latest version of the software, but not at all costs. The distributions before making the available software should do some quality tests. So hurry is never the best way.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment