Originally posted by NiLSPACE
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A Quick Benchmark Of Mozilla Firefox With WebRender Beta vs. Chrome
Collapse
X
-
Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
- Likes 3
-
Originally posted by eydee View PostIn a real life scenario, the difference is a page loading in 0.1 or 0.2 seconds. Not really something a human being can perceive.
Rust wastes more power than proper C++ (not with a million bounds checks) so it's causing global warming more.
- Likes 7
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weasel View PostToo bad your battery or power usage can perceive it.
Rust wastes more power than proper C++ (not with a million bounds checks) so it's causing global warming more.
- Likes 8
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weasel View PostToo bad your battery or power usage can perceive it.
Rust wastes more power than proper C++ (not with a million bounds checks) so it's causing global warming more.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by Michael View Post
I don't keep any active Windows installs around, only when running interesting tests.
I'm getying twice as fast results in motionmark . on my puny 2200G APU
Comment
-
I see in the screenshot that your azure backend is not accelerated. That's also due to some rather weird GPU blacklisting. Set these keys in about:config:
Code:layers.acceleration.force-enabled true gfx.content.azure.accelerated true gfx.canvas.azure.accelerated true
Firefox Linux releases should really stop this sweeping blacklisting and should enable all this by default. Drivers situation today is very different from five years ago.Last edited by shmerl; 27 October 2018, 09:41 PM.
- Likes 18
Comment
-
Was this benchmark hardware accelerated at all on the Firefox end? WebRender has a CPU fallback, and given that Firefox without webrender doesn't achieve such poor results on a Windows machine, I'm going to go out on a limb and say no.
- Likes 6
Comment
Comment