Alright, I think you're a bot, you can't be so retarded as to copy-paste the exact same thing I proved wrong 3 times already.
And VirtualAlloc doesn't need a lock Lol. It's a syscall at its heart. The kernel does that by itself, no userspace locks are needed. (same reason you don't need locks to mmap on Linux)
Here's the deal: show me the memcpy that segfaults by copying from two runtimes without any buffer overflows (also show the code if you want), give me EXACT crash dump and stack trace, with assembly instructions (near the instruction pointer, RIP), or shut the fuck up you stupid clown. You make the claim, so YOU PROVE IT, because the burden of proof is on YOU.
And no, linking to an article that DOESN'T EVEN CONTAIN THE WORD YOU USE is not proof. You might as well link a random wikipedia article about some random animal and it would make more sense.
And VirtualAlloc doesn't need a lock Lol. It's a syscall at its heart. The kernel does that by itself, no userspace locks are needed. (same reason you don't need locks to mmap on Linux)
Here's the deal: show me the memcpy that segfaults by copying from two runtimes without any buffer overflows (also show the code if you want), give me EXACT crash dump and stack trace, with assembly instructions (near the instruction pointer, RIP), or shut the fuck up you stupid clown. You make the claim, so YOU PROVE IT, because the burden of proof is on YOU.
And no, linking to an article that DOESN'T EVEN CONTAIN THE WORD YOU USE is not proof. You might as well link a random wikipedia article about some random animal and it would make more sense.
Comment