Apache Gets Booted From OpenBSD Base Over Being Too Bloated

[Guest]

Actually it didn't, thank god. You know there are a lot of people on this earth that use things for other reasons than simply it is the latest fad or it has a lot of market share. Those are lame reasons to do so. Lame idiotic posers like you and mark45 would do that.

Nice try, but your example has flaws: Linux is newer than BSD and what you wrote was correct years ago when BSD was dominating over Linux. Linux proved to be superior and that's why it replaced BSD.

[Guest]

Heh, you wanna know what IS a dead cow? Your depressing blog (http://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/).

Loser.

It's not my blog. I don't have any blogs FYI. You gave me link to this blog, loser!

[GreatEmerald]

Heh, you wanna know what IS a dead cow? Your depressing blog (http://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/).

Loser.

Actually, this is a dead cow: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaca_Muerta

[Sergio]

It's not my blog. I don't have any blogs FYI. You gave me link to this blog, loser!

It is your blog, and it is dead, Pawerlson (aka kraftman, aka endman, aka BSDSucksDicks, aka LinuxAnalsBSD, aka OpenSLOWLARIS, aka...)

Loser.

[Cthulhux]

Actually, this is a dead cow: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaca_Muerta

^ made my day.

[JX8p]

Personally, I don't see a need for a web server to be part of the default installation for *any* OS or distro. It should be simple to install, sure, but there's no need to have it installed out-of-the-box. You're going to have to install a bunch of updates before using it anyway, so why not just keep the core install small?

OpenBSD prefers to keep these things in the default installation, as they're very big fans on auditing literally every line of code in the system. Keeping these things part of the default install makes it easier for them to say "You're installing something that has definitely been checked from top-to-bottom".

[Gromit]

Should've done this sooner

Nice try, but your example has flaws: Linux is newer than BSD and what you wrote was correct years ago when BSD was dominating over Linux. Linux proved to be superior and that's why it replaced BSD.

Reality check little one. FreeBSD derivatives power PS3, PS4. Ever heard of Isilon (EMC) storage (Apple bought a big such storage system)? Juniper routers? Cisco

Take it from someone who works with Linuxes for a living. Linux is in NO way superior. Hit any Linux with a SYN flood and you bring it to it's knees way easier than a FreeBSD server. Does Linux have a production ready Next Generation filesystem? btrfs ate my files twice so no.

I engineer and administer large scale Linux-systems for a living but it's a mess far beyond most self-proclaimed sysadmins realize. No Linux distro even comes close to the consistency of FreeBSD.
Just because OpenBSD devs have persisted (quite stupidly up to this point IMO) in having Apache in their base (they are quite alone in this) does not BSD irrelevant make. At least for the FreeBSD derivatives, it's never been as busy as it is right now so now you can go back up on your soap box and cry about it. I've just shown how wrong you are and now everyone knows it too

[profoundWHALE]

Wow, Pawlerson's triple post actually made it to the next page. It's a new record!

[david_lynch]

BSD is dying

Linus Torvalds

It is now official. Netcraft has confirmed: *BSD is dying. See the link below for more information.

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/BSD_is_Dying

[beetreetime]

Good.

While we are at it, remove the BSD userland the BShitD kernel. Those crap are far more bloated then apache so should be removed more so then apache.

Replace them with GNU and Linux.