All those X11 supporters in the forums, no code in the development tree though...... Wayland offers many advantages and there is a very good reason it replaced the now DEAD Xorg, it is what it is. Yes Wayland may need a few more protocols, so what? It is not like X11 had been "stable" since 1987.... Basically people these days aren't running X11, they are running DRI3. That's how many alterations have happened to the X11, that modern desktops basically circumvent it after the initialization process and just run DRI3. To claim that Wayland is "bad" just because it receives new extensions for things developers realize they need is just trolling behavior. Wayland was designed to receive extensions.
Also, Wayland is just a protocol, unlike X11 protocol when we had just Xorg and nothing else, with Wayland there are dozens of window compositors to choose from. Even Valve creates their own for their Steam Deck (and said developer made the current article on Phoronix....). Without Wayland, consoles would have to run the bloated behemoth Xorg with all its issues, instead of creating their own display software...
Also, Wayland is just a protocol, unlike X11 protocol when we had just Xorg and nothing else, with Wayland there are dozens of window compositors to choose from. Even Valve creates their own for their Steam Deck (and said developer made the current article on Phoronix....). Without Wayland, consoles would have to run the bloated behemoth Xorg with all its issues, instead of creating their own display software...
Comment