Originally posted by Melcar
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Plymouth Gets Tighter Integration With GDM, X
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by thefirstm View PostNowhere in KDE does it say that you *must* change the settings. If the defaults work for you, then by all means leave them. It is just good to have them there for people who would like to change them.
Nowhere in GNOME does it say you *must* change the settings. Point?
Most people I noticed tend to fixate themselves on KDE's superior customization options. That really gets you nowhere. There are far more interesting features that KDE has over GNOME in the desktop area.Last edited by Melcar; 28 November 2009, 06:09 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Melcar View PostMost beginners and average users simply want a desktop they can work on. Not everyone is interested in changing colors or widget styles. For that GNOME does a pretty good job.
Leave a comment:
-
Most beginners and average users simply want a desktop they can work on. Not everyone is interested in changing colors or widget styles. For that GNOME does a pretty good job.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Melcar View PostGNOME is just as configurable as KDE. The thing is that in KDE it's available from the start (and easily accessible), while in GNOME you usually have to install extra packages or mess around in gconf.
Leave a comment:
-
GNOME is just as configurable as KDE. The thing is that in KDE it's available from the start (and easily accessible), while in GNOME you usually have to install extra packages or mess around in gconf.
Leave a comment:
-
The only thing wrong with GNOME, as I see it, is the complete and total lack of configurability (at least compared to KDE). Add that, and I will give GNOME another chance.
Leave a comment:
-
Nothing wrong with GNOME. All they need to do is fix their damn panels and menu. As is, KDE is a far better desktop, though gtk apps. are for the most part superior to qt ones.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: