Originally posted by dragon321
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
XWayland "Rootfull" Changes Merged For Running A Complete Desktop Environment
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by NateHubbard View Post
If you wanted to run fvwm2, you'd just run an X server.
"If you wanted to run X11 apps you'd just run an X server instead of Xwayland."
"If you wanted to run an app from the 90s you'd just install a version of lInux from the 90s"
etc
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by ehansin View PostNot sure if this is on mark at all, but I thought it was pretty cool in a pure Wayland (setup) where I could be running Sway (light Wayland compositor) and then launch Hikari (another light Wayland compositor) within it.
Wondering in what is being talk about here, could I be running Sway and then launch say i3, or DWM, or whatever X11 DM within that Sway session? Not that I would want to, but this is what the article made me think about.
BMW (no, not "Bring Money With", that being advice you are given when taking a certain care make into the shop for repairs!) As in, "Bare Minimal Wayland", basically a Wayland shim layer.
This is perfect for the "I'll give you my Xmonad when you pry it from my cold, dead hands" set. With BMW, you can Xmodad (and Awesome, and DWM) to your hearts connect until the end of time!
I say let's get on it! This is of course a little satire, but not totally. Again, I think Steam has something like this for run X11 based games on top of Wayland/Xwayland.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by ezst036 View Post
It's always Red Hat who fixes this stuff.
This is not me complaining, just pointing it out.
For me, if Red Hat didn't exist, I would *still* be running Xorg just as I am now. They are effectively irrelevant. if you are going to put a company / project on a pedestal, go for Debian at least. It underlies much more of the ecosystem.
Originally posted by c117152 View PostIt lets you run an x desktop as non-root and without a logind provider.
Unrelated: replacing the "old cruft" underneath Xorg is good. If people want to call this cruft "Wayland", fine by me.Last edited by kpedersen; 01 July 2022, 12:33 PM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by sinepgib View Post
I fail to see the security improvement.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hibbelharry View PostBefore the flamewar starts:
I guess the idea is to be able to remove that bitrot parts of x.org dealing with hardware, lowering maintenance burden. I also guess doing so should have a positive impact on security.
And now: let the fun begin.
I'm tempted to try running some desktop environments inside it someday if I can figure out how. Might be an interesting idea to try MATE and Cinnamon.
Comment
Comment