BTW better to forget about Fire(XYZ) naming (i guess that might be a reason pretty name is not exposed) since new professional line is Radeon Pro.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMDGPU-PRO 16.40 vs. Linux 4.8 + Mesa 13.1-dev Driver Comparison
Collapse
X
-
But that all development, probably the best one can get fro CI is Ubuntu default... mesa 12 + llvm 3.8 on radeon/dri2 or amdgpu-pro on lts yeah
I always recommend stable things for average Joe, even Debian 8 still with fglrx that is most stablier CI... with mention that that does nave UVD but have CL2
Comment
-
Originally posted by QaridariumSo by any perspective the "Pro" driver IS NOT PROFESSIONAL... it is ANTI-Professional
Comment
-
Originally posted by Qaridarium...
So by any perspective the "Pro" driver IS NOT PROFESSIONAL... it is ANTI-Professional
I'm going to dance over the question of what the "PRO" in FirePRO meansLast edited by bridgman; 01 November 2016, 04:10 PM.Test signature
Comment
-
Originally posted by bridgman View PostThe "PRO" in AMDGPU-PRO refers to FirePRO.
Serve the same thing as FGLRX (FireGL and Radeon for X).
As of july this year as Fire brending is putted on fire , and naming is now Radeon PRO - it means it refers to and serve all Radeons, so PRO means it support all the chips
Comment
-
Originally posted by dungeon View PostStill AMDGPU-PRO nowhere listed FirePRO cards as supported, but actually consumer ones
In the meantime we started shipping early releases of the stack because it was useful for users of consumer cards.
We could have called it AMDGPU-GOING-TO-BE-PRO initially but it's hard getting things like that past Legal.Last edited by bridgman; 01 November 2016, 06:04 PM.Test signature
Comment
Comment