Originally posted by chithanh
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Has A Vulkan Linux Driver, But Will Be Closed-Source At First
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by chithanh View PostI think you are confusing two people.
Stallman is fine with buying (pre-Maxwell) NVidia cards: https://stallman.org/to-4chan.html
Linus Torvalds however...
EDIT: To be fair I have a similar issue with the name of a lot of KDE applications.
EDIT: Stallman is definitely at least partly to blame why linux distributions don't have a larger market share. He's wrong. Personally I think it's time for GNU toolchain packages to be replaced totally. That way we'll never have to see his nonsense ever again.Last edited by duby229; 17 September 2015, 09:14 PM.
Comment
-
I'm really glad that at least they are talking about it. The idea that only the Fiji chips will get support for Vulkan on Linux really sucks though, if that is found to be true in time.
I bought an R9 390 to be in the loop, but if buying even this current gen card doesn't allow me to be in the loop (yet God forbid, Windows users with the same card are in the loop), then my anger will be justified.
Regardless, it's all speculation until further details emerge. I'm just grateful that Nvidia isn't the only one with a day-one plan for Vulkan now. We need all of them to be in, so that the platform can grow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sabun View PostI'm really glad that at least they are talking about it. The idea that only the Fiji chips will get support for Vulkan on Linux really sucks though, if that is found to be true in time.
I bought an R9 390 to be in the loop, but if buying even this current gen card doesn't allow me to be in the loop (yet God forbid, Windows users with the same card are in the loop), then my anger will be justified.
edit: for clearance if anyone wants to use amdgpu driver he should buy Fiji or Tonga cards or Carrizo APU.
edit2: AMD marketing names range cards per performance, not per generation!Last edited by dungeon; 17 September 2015, 10:24 PM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Leveraging existing internal codebase
Comment
-
Originally posted by Master5000 View Post
Totally agree. That fool only does more harm than good. I think it's time we get rid of him for good. Fuck his GNU shit. Let's ban him from the Linux community. He's a loser anyway by any standards.
Watching currently what Marek has to say about stutter
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Expectations, Pronunciation, and Arrogance. If that's not trying to convince people they need to stutter. It might just be better to call very distro GNU GNU/GNU.
EDIT: For reference here is actual proper pronunciation.
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/p...on/english/gnuLast edited by duby229; 17 September 2015, 11:30 PM.
Comment
-
I am not fully sure if somebody wants an AMDGPU based Vulkan driver today. As 4.3 RC is already out there will be most likely no power management until 4.4 or later, this means best possible date around 6 months from now. Maybe AMD could provide that driver out of tree for dkms install and older kernels but that would not help much. As soon as the new stack is out - I expect more like Q2/16 than this year then they will most likely create a Win10 DX12 driver with dropped support for older chips and use the same hardware requirement for Linux. They could still provide a legacy fglrx driver but like it worked last time you had to collect lots of kernel driver patches yourself and sooner or later the driver could not be used with current Xorg core.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kano View PostI am not fully sure if somebody wants an AMDGPU based Vulkan driver today. As 4.3 RC is already out there will be most likely no power management until 4.4 or later, this means best possible date around 6 months from now. Maybe AMD could provide that driver out of tree for dkms install and older kernels but that would not help much. As soon as the new stack is out - I expect more like Q2/16 than this year then they will most likely create a Win10 DX12 driver with dropped support for older chips and use the same hardware requirement for Linux. They could still provide a legacy fglrx driver but like it worked last time you had to collect lots of kernel driver patches yourself and sooner or later the driver could not be used with current Xorg core.
I don't think it'll take that long for amdgpu to develop into a more functional state though. Sure it will be done incrementally, but I think it will be better sooner than you think it will be.
Comment
Comment