I think the numbers are a little low. 3%-5% is what I'd wager for home use. Most big marketing firms have a hard time tracking linux since most people don't buy it, they download for free from a variety of places. The success of Dell's linux program and the EE PC should finally help dispel that argument.
AMD also should figure that the people making hardware purchasing decisions have a distinct skew for linux. At work I opted to get AMD cards for Windows boxes too, since chances are after a 1-2 year life cycle under XP they will be running linux.
As far as vendor support, would I love it if AMD spent more time and effort on Linux drivers, but I realize that there are limited resources. I'd argue that AMD should spend less time with fglrx and more time with the OSS drivers, but there is already at least one thread here where it was made clear that developer talent can't be so easily transitioned. Also, a lot of linux graphics work isn't so much the driver itself, but the frameworks, and anyone spending a good amount of time on phoronix sees that better support is coming.
For those thinking its some vast conspiracy, try to remember that a lot of problems with linux graphics don't come from vendors, but from the developers themselves. I mean, just google for the kernel mode setting discussions from the early 90s, or the XFree86 vs. X.org stuff, or some of the recent TTM flames, etc.
Finally, I wish I had the ability to help make the drivers better myself, but sadly I just don't. I do develop on a couple of linux games, so I'm indirecting doing a part (more games, means more demand for 3D, etc.). And finally, although I don't want to sound like an open source cliche, how about instead of whining about support, you open a terminal and try to help out?
AMD also should figure that the people making hardware purchasing decisions have a distinct skew for linux. At work I opted to get AMD cards for Windows boxes too, since chances are after a 1-2 year life cycle under XP they will be running linux.
As far as vendor support, would I love it if AMD spent more time and effort on Linux drivers, but I realize that there are limited resources. I'd argue that AMD should spend less time with fglrx and more time with the OSS drivers, but there is already at least one thread here where it was made clear that developer talent can't be so easily transitioned. Also, a lot of linux graphics work isn't so much the driver itself, but the frameworks, and anyone spending a good amount of time on phoronix sees that better support is coming.
For those thinking its some vast conspiracy, try to remember that a lot of problems with linux graphics don't come from vendors, but from the developers themselves. I mean, just google for the kernel mode setting discussions from the early 90s, or the XFree86 vs. X.org stuff, or some of the recent TTM flames, etc.
Finally, I wish I had the ability to help make the drivers better myself, but sadly I just don't. I do develop on a couple of linux games, so I'm indirecting doing a part (more games, means more demand for 3D, etc.). And finally, although I don't want to sound like an open source cliche, how about instead of whining about support, you open a terminal and try to help out?
Comment