Well aware of that one. Well aware that the trend is towards replacing bits & pieces. Well aware it takes extra time to certify new drivers against multiple xorg (or even xfree86) versions. Still doesn't mean I like an invasive driver.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Catalyst 10.1 and Xorg 7.5 / 1.7.x?
Collapse
X
-
-
You can be sure even Xserver 1.4 is still enough for most ppl with Kanotix. Only those with Intel series 4 gfx have got some performance problems compared to other drivers. That means when you use binary drivers the difference does not matter at all. But for Intel or ATI oss with kms or whatever you may want to use a new Xserver. It is unlikely that U will downgrade the Xserver when they want to support latest Intel onboard chips. ATI really has to wake up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by monraaf View PostI don't know exactly which community you are speaking out for, but I think a lot of people who bought a HD 5xxxx card, me included, would disagree with this.
Originally posted by energyman View Postand what is so important about 1.7 that you must have it? Apart from the version number?
oh wait.. nothing.
Originally posted by djee View PostFrom what I know, given that most distributions are moving to Xorg 7.5/1.7.x and that downgrading is a mess (impossible?) most users will end up being totally unable to use ATI proprietary drivers because of their daily/weekly upgrade.
Originally posted by not.sure View PostTrue. But if something is already old enough to be in Debian testing(!!), and you still say it's 'too new'.. well.. that can't be good. Then even users with a rather conservative upgrade philosophy will be stuck.
Comment
-
Originally posted by djee View PostI've got a Mobility HD 3650. It's been supported since recently, at least officially. Yet older drivers works perfectly well without "official" support. I had OpenGL 3.0, then 3.1, then 3.2 support and was able to use the latest functionality. That was more than expected. Now I'm stuck with OpenGL 2.1 with open source drivers
If only I could run these drivers side-by-side. The oss driver on my IGP for normal desktop usage and video watching, and fglrx on my HD 5750 for the casual 3D gaming.
Comment
-
Yes I know you can use Mplayer with gl output to get tear-free playback. And nothing negative about Mplayer, but it's just a video player, not a solution. I mostly use Miro. It has two backends GStreamer and Xine. The Xine backend chokes on my mkv files, so that's not an option. And the GStreamer backend works great with Xv output but the GStreamer gl output is horribly broken.
Comment
-
Originally posted by energyman View Postand what is so important about 1.7 that you must have it? Apart from the version number?
oh wait.. nothing.
Comment
-
I may add that I'm running fglrx on mobility radeon 3650 with xserver 1.6.3 and synaptics are there and working.
So, it's not that You need 1.7 to have synaptics
P.S. I just can't figure out (didn't try much) how to improve performance with fglrx in KDE4...
Comment
Comment