Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Open-Source ATI R300 Graphics Driver Is Still Being Improved Upon In 2024

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Open-Source ATI R300 Graphics Driver Is Still Being Improved Upon In 2024

    Phoronix: The Open-Source ATI R300 Graphics Driver Is Still Being Improved Upon In 2024

    It's been over twenty years since the ATI Radeon R300 series was introduced but thanks to the open-source Mesa Gallium3D OpenGL driver, there continues to be new improvements made to this driver for these aging Radeon graphics cards on Linux. A few hundred lines of code were merged today for further enhancing the ATI R300 Gallium3D driver in 2024...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    It is reasonable that with as fast as hardware is these days (and the days when R300 was new) that for light browsing and other simple tasks people keep their hardware for a 20 year or more window.

    This hardware is old, but it is not ancient.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by ezst036 View Post
      It is reasonable that with as fast as hardware is these days (and the days when R300 was new) that for light browsing and other simple tasks people keep their hardware for a 20 year or more window.

      This hardware is old, but it is not ancient.
      Agreed - if it works for your needs then there's no point replacing it. However, once you factor in power consumption, limited acceleration for modern functions, and fan noise (fans were a lot louder 20 years ago), sometimes just buying a used modern system for under $300 could be worth it.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
        Agreed - if it works for your needs then there's no point replacing it. However, once you factor in power consumption, limited acceleration for modern functions, and fan noise (fans were a lot louder 20 years ago), sometimes just buying a used modern system for under $300 could be worth it.
        Not really. Power consumption was way lower back then. The ATI Radeon 9700 (which is an ati r300) had a tdp of 37W.

        Comment


        • #5
          One argument for continued support of old GPUs is that some old systems are pre-PCIe. I'm not just talking about x86, either. So long as Linux continues to run on systems that have only legacy PCI slots, there will be a need to support GPUs that were sold in regular PCI form factor (i.e. not PCIe).

          Due to the relationship of AGP and PCI, I think GPU generations with an AGP version should include at least one model with a legacy PCI interface.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Nuc!eoN View Post

            Not really. Power consumption was way lower back then. The ATI Radeon 9700 (which is an ati r300) had a tdp of 37W.
            Let's try not equating TDP to power consumption, please.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by ezst036 View Post
              It is reasonable that with as fast as hardware is these days (and the days when R300 was new) that for light browsing and other simple tasks people keep their hardware for a 20 year or more window.

              This hardware is old, but it is not ancient.
              Sadly, these days Chrome (and probably Firefox too) runs emulated (SW rendering) on one's old CPU instead of on one's old GPU due to a lack of features (OpenGL/Vulkan).

              Not long ago I thought it's better to have an AMD/ATI than NVIDIA GPU long-term due to their open-source strategy allowing near endless HW drivers support, but if essential SW doesn't support the HW then there is little difference.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ezst036 View Post
                It is reasonable that with as fast as hardware is these days (and the days when R300 was new) that for light browsing and other simple tasks people keep their hardware for a 20 year or more window.

                This hardware is old, but it is not ancient.
                Do R300 cards even support Wayland compositors? My question is out of pure curiosity because R600 hardware is totally okay for a modern light desktop use.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by NSLW View Post
                  Sadly, these days Chrome (and probably Firefox too) runs emulated (SW rendering) on one's old CPU instead of on one's old GPU due to a lack of features (OpenGL/Vulkan).
                  What is their minimum OpenGL/Vulkan requirement?

                  Originally posted by NSLW View Post
                  ​Not long ago I thought it's better to have an AMD/ATI than NVIDIA GPU long-term due to their open-source strategy allowing near endless HW drivers support, but if essential SW doesn't support the HW then there is little difference.
                  Eh, at least you can play Tux Racer at blistering framerates!
                  🐧

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Nuc!eoN View Post
                    Not really. Power consumption was way lower back then. The ATI Radeon 9700 (which is an ati r300) had a tdp of 37W.
                    Hmm, seems you're right. I must've been thinking of something a bit newer.

                    Originally posted by coder View Post
                    One argument for continued support of old GPUs is that some old systems are pre-PCIe. I'm not just talking about x86, either. So long as Linux continues to run on systems that have only legacy PCI slots, there will be a need to support GPUs that were sold in regular PCI form factor (i.e. not PCIe).

                    Due to the relationship of AGP and PCI, I think GPU generations with an AGP version should include at least one model with a legacy PCI interface.
                    You're right that it's good to have compatibility while PCI and AGP are still in use, but, you don't have to opt for something as old as R300. There's a GT 610 that works on PCI, or a HD 5450 if you prefer AMD. Granted, those are rare, but my point is you aren't limited to such old hardware.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X