Originally posted by kirsche
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD 8.35.5 Driver -- Hello Catalyst Control Center Linux Edition!
Collapse
X
-
Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
-
I installed the new ati drivers from my distro (frugalware).
I cant get the control center to work:
Code:mikko@frugalware:~$ amdcccle amdcccle: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Asserzione `c->xlib.lock' fallita. Abortito
Thanks
Comment
-
Originally posted by yoshi314 View Postnot true. the old panel sources are still there - gentoo ebuild still is able to compile it.
/common/usr/src/ati/fglrx_panel_sources.tgz - here they are (inside the makeself archive).
However, the panel sources is being removed in 8.36.Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
Comment
-
Anybody tried to install fglrx driver on latest slackware-current with modular X.org?
I install the driver, compile the kernel module, but after aticonfig --initial X.org refuses to start, complaining about mismatching module requierements. Particulary it says fglrx module is compiled for 6.9.xx but 1.3.xx is found. Any souliutions?
Comment
-
xorg 7.2 and 7.3 are reporting xorg version 1.2 and 1.3 with X -version command
I imagine this is the source of the error. I'm not clear if this naming method will change or be altered to reflect the actual numbers, 7.2 and 7.3.
I imagine you can locate the detection in the installer scripts and hack the code to properly handle the xorg numbering.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gfxdrone View Postxorg 7.2 and 7.3 are reporting xorg version 1.2 and 1.3 with X -version commandCode:X -version X Window System Version 7.2.0 Release Date: 22 January 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.2
Comment
-
Yes, could be the rc issue, we're seeing that in the xorg packages stuck in debian experimental, they show 1.2.x, whereas X -version shows 7.1.x for sid
We'll see what happens with that naming once 7.2 comes into sid, not sure if it's the new naming method or not, hope not.
Re matrox, I'm assured that Matrox support simply sucks for Linux. Old, new, all sucks. New especially. Makes ATI look good, which is quite an achievement.Last edited by gfxdrone; 01 April 2007, 04:28 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by b15hop View PostOh you little beauty! I just tried then, I can now finally get back to X without having to reboot my system. Now to get rid of this Mesa crap...
Comment
-
Hi Guys,
I've been able to build the packages successfuly and got the following:
kernel-module-ATI-fglrx-2.6.20-1.2933.fc6-8.35.5-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
ATI-fglrx-8.35.5-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
ATI-fglrx-devel-8.35.5-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
ATI-fglrx-control-center-8.35.5-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
ATI-fglrx-IA32-libs-8.35.5-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
Installing them in that order (using rpm -ivh xxx.rpm), I get an error when I try either of the last two rpms (control center or IA32):
error: Failed dependencies:
libstdc++.so.5 is needed by ATI-fglrx-control-center-8.35.5-1.fc6.x86_64
libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2) is needed by ATI-fglrx-control-center-8.35.5-1.fc6.x86_64
libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by ATI-fglrx-control-center-8.35.5-1.fc6.x86_64
Problem being, I've installed both the 32 bit and 64 bit compat-stdlibc++ libraries (the kernel was pretty specific in asking for 64 bit, then this one asked for 32 bit), but still get this issue.
Fedora 6, x86_64 on a core 2 duo with X1950 pro. Any ideas?
Comment
Comment