Originally posted by eydee
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AMD Announces The Radeon Pro VII
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 7
-
Originally posted by Geopirate View PostWait, none of them? So AMD hasn't released a card with SR_IOV for 4 years?
https://www.amd.com/en/products/prof.../instinct-mi25Last edited by bridgman; 13 May 2020, 01:32 PM.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by moriel5 View PostCan someone give me a recommendation (for my sister) as to how much VRAM is recommended for professional video editing with Davinci Resolve Pro on Windows 10?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zxy_thf View PostA few differences I noticed:
1. TDP: 295W->250W, likely due to the improvements from TSMC
Maybe also a warranty thing, since lower clocks translate to better longevity, and I'm pretty sure it has a longer warranty than Vega VII. Also, it's more likely to be running 24/7 workloads that Radeon VII, which was marketed as a gaming card.
Originally posted by zxy_thf View PostI'm not sure FP64 is still a thing for GPU computing...
Leave a comment:
-
Can someone give me a recommendation (for my sister) as to how much VRAM is recommended for professional video editing with Davinci Resolve Pro on Windows 10?
My country does not import any AMD Pro or Vega-based cards at all, with the cheapest 16GB NVidia option being the equivalent of ~2200$ (with a Radeon VII, or a used Vega Frontier on Amazon, including shipping from the US, being the equivalent of ~900$). Also, given the issues outlined here with GCN/CRDN, would they still be a recommendation for video editing, or does that suffer the same way as gaming (my sister does not game)?
If so, the next best option would be a 11GB GTX 1080 Ti for the equivalent of ~750$).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostSpeaking of which, is that the only difference between this and the Radeon VII?- is 300 W (this is 250)
- runs at higher clocks (boosts to 1750 MHz instead of 1700 MHz)
- has only PCIe 3.0 (instead of 4.0)
- has half of the fp64 performance
- has no over-the-top Infinity Link connector for direct card-to-card communication.
- costs $700 (this lists for $1900)
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostAlso... wasn't the Radeon VII basically just a binned workstation GPU? If so, does that mean this is a bin of a bin?- Mac-specific Radeon Pro II & Pro II Duo
- MI50 & MI60 (which lack any display outputs)
That's not to say it wasn't binned at all, since it has only 60 CUs, yet the MI60 and Radeon Pro II have 64.Last edited by coder; 13 May 2020, 01:08 PM.
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by make_adobe_on_Linux! View PostHow will it allow for multi-GPU (using passthrough) -> single display?
The links are general purpose - they just give each GPU the ability to access HBM on a linked GPU with very high performance - although I expect they will be used for compute at least as much as for graphics.
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
How will it allow for multi-GPU (using passthrough) -> single display?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eydee View PostMaking a pro version of an already failed product which is also on the verge of being artificially moved to artificial legacy state due to being a too old architecture.
Originally posted by eydee View PostBeing a good architecture for compute means nothing if AMD says the opposite and doesn't provide the drivers. Has everyone forgotten Terascale already? Even after a decade, OGL4 support is still blocked because AMD says so. Being open source changes nothing, AMD controls that part of Mesa. GCN has been out for more than what Terascale ever got. It can be shut down tomorrow. Even today. Just to boost RDNA sales. They don't even need a valid reason.
What do you think we have been blocking via controlling "that part of Mesa" ?
How can we "shut down tomorrow" an upstream open source driver ? I didn't think any company was that powerful.Last edited by bridgman; 13 May 2020, 12:39 PM.
- Likes 12
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: