I gave xf86-video-ati-6.10.0 a try the other day and noticed 2D was blitzing fast compared to fglrx; doing a 'dmesg' in xterm was now instanteneous (with fglrx I'd see it scroll text for a while), resizing gvim was superfast too (seems to do a lot of redrawing, more so than normal gtk+ apps), even the graphs rendered by gnome-system-monitor which are horribly slow on fglrx were smooth as butter on ati.
People in #radeon on freenode told me this is likely because my (C2D E8400) CPU which was now doing all the work because there was no 2D accel for r600+ chips. which I guess makes sense. So I then tried to see what performance was like with the NoAccel option set with fglrx, but that was really way worse :/
I'm not sure what the downsides are of having my CPU doing 2D as it is with xf86-video-ati, I tried it for a few days and didn't notice any other adverse effects other than playing video (understandably) using a lot more CPU time. I was especially happy about gvim, I use it a lot when I hack on code and faster scrolling and window manipulation (split screens etc.) really makes it much more pleasurable
People in #radeon on freenode told me this is likely because my (C2D E8400) CPU which was now doing all the work because there was no 2D accel for r600+ chips. which I guess makes sense. So I then tried to see what performance was like with the NoAccel option set with fglrx, but that was really way worse :/
I'm not sure what the downsides are of having my CPU doing 2D as it is with xf86-video-ati, I tried it for a few days and didn't notice any other adverse effects other than playing video (understandably) using a lot more CPU time. I was especially happy about gvim, I use it a lot when I hack on code and faster scrolling and window manipulation (split screens etc.) really makes it much more pleasurable
Comment