Wow! People are still talking about Clang? That's a dead project already! Move on guys...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Early GCC 7 Compiler Benchmarks On Linux: Some Performance Improvements
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by emblemparade View PostWow, weird politics going on here. You do know that gcc and clang developers are pretty much all friends? clang enjoyed the benefit of being able to start from scratch with a new architecture, so the internal design is much better. The gcc folks want to get there, but they have the much bigger problem of requiring huge legacy compatibility, so they move more slowly with refactoring. It's impossible to share code because of the license incompatibility, but everyone is talking and sharing ideas.
Comment
-
Originally posted by atomsymbol
Why is clang a dead project?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adarion View PostI hope besides all the performance that this will result in completed compilation of code and binaries that do not exhibit strange runtime problems. It might have a reason that Gentoo dev team takes some time to declare new compilers as "stable".
Comment
-
GCC and Clang are both great compilers and I hope they both are successful. I prefer both of them to MSVC or ICC. Clang often produces more intriguing machine code but in practice the performance differences are not significant enough for me to prefer one. GCC has better OpenMP support so that's an advantage for me.
Comment
Comment