GCC 5 Feature Development Is Over With A Focus Now On Bug-Fixing

[clavko]

Try harder Sherlock, or buy yourself some sense of humor.

I agree, you're not making any sense. LLVM is not a part of a resulting binary,
and is not needed for execution. In that sense it does not work like Java or .NET
Also Clang is a C++11 standard compatible. I think you got confused a little bit.

[pgoetz]

Try harder Sherlock, or buy yourself some sense of humor.

The /joking tip off should have been when he said "this makes the compiler ideal for areas where precision is less important or not at all, like in the military or medicine." Let's be clear that I want compilers used in conjunction with medical procedures I'm having to be as precise as possible.

[caligula]

What you say is a complete nonsense.

He's right in the sense that the internal tree in GCC isn't as strongly typed as in some research compilers made with functional languages. C/C++ sucks ass so it's not possible to make a decent internal representation. For starters, how about getting proper sum and product types. Then, depedent types.