Originally posted by brad0
View Post
Originally posted by brad0
View Post
I said that the GPL 'zealots' have been on the defensive in the discussion.
caligula: "GPL products are usually of much lower quality than BSD code. Compare gnu libc and musl. Musl wins. Compare LLVM and GCC. Much less code in LLVM. tmux vs gnu screen? The BSD always wins. BSD cares about code quality and professional coders use it. Even companies use it. GPL otoh is closer to communism and they believe that everyone should be able to tinker with bad quality code. RMS himself said the top priority is preventing companies from using the tools. Having technical merits is not important for GNU. So it's kind of easy to see why people favor BSD software. For example LLVM has a simple goal to be technically superior to GCC and let companies use it. GCC wants to enforce GPLv3 down your throat and stop Apple from using it."
Marc Driftmeyer: "Sorry, but any halfwit can figure out that GCC is becoming a disease with the GPLv3 and beyond."
So... yeah, we've been on the defensive and those crazy accusations I wrote were actually levelled against FSF/GPL/copyleft.
Comment