LLVM 3.1 Officially Released

[curaga]

Yep, Gentoo does the same. That's exactly the issue I mean.

[ChrisXY]

No problems with arch's llvm-svn package from AUR edited to build the final svn tag either but it is build with

make REQUIRES_RTTI=1

so this could be relevant.

[Veerappan]

- still doesn't build by default with gcc (uses -fno-rtti even though it needs RTTI, bug present since 2.9 at least), requires Makefile hacking
- still doesn't install the clang static analyzer, have to copy manually

+ this time no toolchain path hacking needed, it actually found the gcc/glibc init files

Hmm... I've had no problems doing a stock build (./configure && make && make install) of 3.1 branch checkouts of LLVM/Clang using gcc. Admittedly, I haven't tried with the released 3.1, so maybe they broke it again...

System: Mint 12 x64

[curaga]

- still doesn't build by default with gcc (uses -fno-rtti even though it needs RTTI, bug present since 2.9 at least), requires Makefile hacking
- still doesn't install the clang static analyzer, have to copy manually

+ this time no toolchain path hacking needed, it actually found the gcc/glibc init files

[Tuxoholic]

is there a debian repo for 3.1?

[FireBurn]

Interesting that Gentoo now has Tier 1 support (they are providing binaries for gentoo).

That seems a bit redundant seeing as any Gentooer worth their salt would be compiling for themselves anyway

[scottishduck]

Interesting that Gentoo now has Tier 1 support (they are providing binaries for gentoo).

[phoronix]

Phoronix: LLVM 3.1 Officially Released

After a week-long hiatus, LLVM 3.1 has been officially released...

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTEwNTM