Originally posted by tuxd3v
View Post
And I believe the "3nm processes" are only academic results... Things like graphene ICs or IIRC sub-nanometer equivalent feature sizes are already possible, although only in labs, and decades away from mass adoption. And all major countries have achieved similar feat too.
EDIT: I forgot one simple point; the 3A5000 is the "tick" / die-shrink of 3A4000, so they could simply go back to 28nm if not even 14/16nm processes are available. Performance drops are extremely minor concerns when trade wars escalate to this level. (Yes the ISA has been changed, but that's only some minor decoder stage tweaking; as one can see from the GS132 sources (Loongson-1 series), probably some wire changes are all it takes to switch ISA.)
Comment