Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Linux's getrandom() Sees A 8450% Improvement With Latest Code

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Linux's getrandom() Sees A 8450% Improvement With Latest Code

    Phoronix: Linux's getrandom() Sees A 8450% Improvement With Latest Code

    The Linux kernel's random number generator code has been seeing a number of improvements recently led by Jason Donenfeld of WireGuard fame...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Wow. Just like with WireGuard - simpler, faster, more secure than the old designs. Jason Donenfeld is such a great engineer.

    Comment


    • #3
      Not over 9000, not impressed.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post
        Not over 9000, not impressed.
        Complete trash, I agree.

        Comment


        • #5
          Does this make my NumPy np.random.random calls on Python faster on Linux?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Random_Jerk View Post
            Does this make my NumPy np.random.random calls on Python faster on Linux?
            It depends on build flags, there's a strong random mode that uses the kernel's facilities and there's a mode that only generates pseudo random numbers. Note that this is only used for the seed from what I could see in my quick check (I may or may not have missed something), so it's only for the first call. Everything else is arithmetic only.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post
              Not over 9000, not impressed.
              Krilin should train it a bit more

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by mdedetrich View Post
                Not over 9000, not impressed.
                They had a 9000% improvement, but this did not seem random enough.

                PS. I am usually against adblockers, I just dont watch sites that abuse them. Right now the adds appear over the "Post reply" button which royally pisses me off.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by discordian View Post
                  PS. I am usually against adblockers, I just dont watch sites that abuse them. Right now the adds appear over the "Post reply" button which royally pisses me off.
                  give adnauseam a try, it hides ads doesn't block them, and apparently spoofs clicks on them (I have mine set to fairly conservative, but by default it clicks on pretty much all ads)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Is it just me or there is a kernel’s bottlenecks hunt these past few months. Love it.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X