Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GCC 10 vs. GCC 11 Compiler Performance On The Threadripper 3990X

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Paradigm Shifter
    replied
    The FFTW improvements have me interested.

    Leave a comment:


  • dev_null
    replied
    IMHO adding compilation time to geometric mean with performance is incorrect, these are different entities and it is like add mass and loudness. End users never see compilation time when launch already built software.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brane215
    replied
    At this point, they should just increase minor version.
    There are no big changes in backend, anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • CaptainLugnuts
    replied
    Grammar police!
    The title of the article should be "GCC 10 vs. GCC 11 Compiler Performance For The Threadripper 3990X"
    Using "On" there means you are testing the functionality of the compilers rather than the compiler's output.

    Leave a comment:


  • pyler
    replied
    Can you add LLVM 13 trunk to future comparison with LLVM 12 and gcc 11 as well?

    I am very interested about changes caused by new pass manager in llvm 13

    Leave a comment:


  • GCC 10 vs. GCC 11 Compiler Performance On The Threadripper 3990X

    Phoronix: GCC 10 vs. GCC 11 Compiler Performance On The Threadripper 3990X

    With GCC 11 stable likely to be released next month, here is the latest in our compiler testing against the current GCC 10 stable release. This round of tests was carried out on a System76 Thelio Major with Ryzen Threadripper 3990X HEDT processor.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X