Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LLVM Clang 10.0 Compiler Performance On Intel + AMD CPUs Under Linux

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pyler
    replied
    libc++ is poor

    Leave a comment:


  • rene
    replied
    Originally posted by Setif View Post
    Benchmark: gcc+ld+libstdc++ vs clang+lld+libc++
    I did this, the result was not amazing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBC9C4L1J-k

    Leave a comment:


  • rene
    replied
    about as much performance improvement as I guesstimated ;-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFSW6xKBTy8

    Leave a comment:


  • Grinch
    replied
    The dav1d 10-bit encode performance
    That should be 'decode'

    Leave a comment:


  • Setif
    replied
    Benchmark: gcc+ld+libstdc++ vs clang+lld+libc++

    Leave a comment:


  • LLVM Clang 10.0 Compiler Performance On Intel + AMD CPUs Under Linux

    Phoronix: LLVM Clang 10.0 Compiler Performance On Intel + AMD CPUs Under Linux

    With last week's release of LLVM/Clang 10.0, here are our first benchmarks looking at the stable release of the Clang 10.0 C/C++ compiler compared to its previous (v9.0.1) release on various Intel and AMD processors under Ubuntu Linux.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=29024
Working...
X