Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LLVM Clang 10.0 Compiler Performance On Intel + AMD CPUs Under Linux

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pyler
    replied
    libc++ is poor

    Leave a comment:


  • rene
    replied
    Originally posted by Setif View Post
    Benchmark: gcc+ld+libstdc++ vs clang+lld+libc++
    I did this, the result was not amazing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBC9C4L1J-k

    Leave a comment:


  • rene
    replied
    about as much performance improvement as I guesstimated ;-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFSW6xKBTy8

    Leave a comment:


  • Grinch
    replied
    The dav1d 10-bit encode performance
    That should be 'decode'

    Leave a comment:


  • Setif
    replied
    Benchmark: gcc+ld+libstdc++ vs clang+lld+libc++

    Leave a comment:


  • LLVM Clang 10.0 Compiler Performance On Intel + AMD CPUs Under Linux

    Phoronix: LLVM Clang 10.0 Compiler Performance On Intel + AMD CPUs Under Linux

    With last week's release of LLVM/Clang 10.0, here are our first benchmarks looking at the stable release of the Clang 10.0 C/C++ compiler compared to its previous (v9.0.1) release on various Intel and AMD processors under Ubuntu Linux.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X