Do KDE developers even want to merge patches for Unity/Mir on Ubuntu Touch?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ubuntu Touch Fully Forks Its Email Client
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by chrisb View PostDo KDE developers even want to merge patches for Unity/Mir on Ubuntu Touch?
Since Ubuntu Touch is using QtQuick and Trojita is currently QWidget based, there is likely adapter code that Trojita could be interested in for their own QtQuick based UIfi they eventually want to have one.
Cheers,
_
Comment
-
Originally posted by Awesomeness View PostNo but it would be beneficial for both projects if fixes in the IMAP back-end etc. can be used in both projects.
And the community jumps on every shitstorm someone is trying to start :/ (like seen in this thread and how people talk about canonical having a CLA while they dont even know that even KDE asks their contributers to sign a CLA)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by k1l_ View PostOk, its called "FLA" but is infact a CLA.
And it is not a requirement, one can contribute to any part of KDE's efforts without it.
Cheers,
_
Comment
-
Originally posted by k1l_ View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by k1l_ View PostYes, cooperation would be great. Not only between Canonical and KDE, but all over the open source community. But instead its a mudslinging Contest with politcal(commercial) Agendas where the community is used to push own interests.
And the community jumps on every shitstorm someone is trying to start :/ (like seen in this thread and how people talk about canonical having a CLA while they dont even know that even KDE asks their contributers to sign a CLA)
The topic I brought up was the removal of the ?any later version? clause and Canonical did that all by themselves.
Comment
Comment