Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
also your babbling that PS5 does not have 16gb vram of course it is "shared" you can write software with "16gb textures" then you have no space for other stuff but still you can.
this GTX 1060 only has 3gb VRAM it can not even display what the PS5 can display by this fact alone all the FPS numbers are fake because you will see ugly helper textures or if you walk in new area no textures at all.
there are already games who use raytracing on the playstation5
most of the games and engines wait until FSR1.0 and FSR2.0 hit the game engines then they can enable raytracing togeter with the FSR to get the FPS they want combined with raytracing effects.
"but right now a GTX 1060 is fine"
dude you just fool yourself... it looks more and more like you are not even able to talk about "apple M2"
plain and simple because you do not even unterstand the nessary differences between playstation5 and a GTX1060 you only talk about high FPS.. but only Fools think FPS is what matters...
if one system has high FPS with only 3GB vram forces to less textures or lower resolution textures with helper textures or no textures at all at some point in the game and another system has low FPS with maximum on vram and maximum of texture resolution and so one then by logic the slower system is better.
same effect on apple M2... you compare it to GTX1060 or even a GTX1660 or whatever who only has low amount of vram... and the apple M1/M2 has 16/24 GB ram shared means VRAM... and the apple M2 max has even more and so one...
then the apple solution is much better even if they have lower FPS. because by this logic you can buy 10 year old card with only 1gb vram and the cripple the texture resolution to zero and claim you have more FPS...
what a bullshit show you do here.
Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
dude,,, honestly computer tech does not work like you claim here.
my computer has 128gb ram and my vega64 has 8gb vram it is more than you claim...
but the tech plain and simple does not work like this.
the playstation 5 can hold more textures than my vega64 even if you count the FPS my Vega64 is faster.
its faster in FPS but this is bullshit because the vega64 can not even display the same quality.
to claim it is faster is bullshit bingo.
same vor apple M1/M2 it can hold much more vram textures than your claimed 6gb vram card or my vega64...
"and will perform better."
YOU ARE A FOOL... it can not even display the same quality means it can not perform better
it can only do more FPS if the settings are so low that you lose quality.
really man you are a fool...
"Keep in mind that CPU's don't care so much for bandwidth as much as latency, which is why we use DDR and not GDDR, as GDDR exchanges latency for bandwidth"
this is wrong in modern cpus this was only true in single core and dualcore cpu and quatcore cpu time.
if you have many cores means 64cores or more the need for latency fade away and all you need is bandwidth
and all what needs latency is cached in L2 and L3 cache...
"Having a system with DDR for CPU and GDDR or HBM for GPU is still best."
in your outdated world of course. on my threadripper system with ECC and maximum amount of ram 128/256GB the system can only handle standard ram at 3200mhz and if i put the 2990WX in my system tests show latency becomes less and less relevant because the 32cores need to feed their caches thats means it needs bandwidth...
also if you see low-core-count cpus like the 5800X3D then it is clear RAM does not matter at all.
the effect between the fastest and slowest ram on the 5800X3D is very small.
also best latency vs worst latency also does not matter on the 5800X3D.
this means your opinion is already obsolete future high-core-count cpus with stacked 3D cache only need massive bandwidth...
Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
in the near future ther will be AMD-FSR2.0 games together with raytracing with high texture resolutions in the games... your idea you can compete with years old GTX1060 is just the fools dream.
Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
for casual gaming like god of wars of other stuff like cacual gamers play then yes a 5800X3D is better.
dude i save money for a 2990WX combined with my 128gb ram i am sure Gentoo is happy.
Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
now you claim my 1 billion dollar comodore 64 game is not AAA..-. hell you are a fool...
"A Threadripper CPU with a Vega64 is not the average"
wrong i bought it in 2017... today it is the average... many people have a 12core cpu like the AMD 5900X
and many people have a AMD radeon 6600XT what is only 8% faster than a vega64...
Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
and we already passes the point of no return for microsoft.
Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
nvidia only supports openCL3.0 because as soon as you support 1.1 you can claim you support 3,0 even if you do not support a single feature better than 1.1.
in fact nvidia did sapotage openCL... to push the people to CUDA
Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
but i do not know a single person who do want to use maxosx...
"Apple watch with iphone"
i tell you something i avoid contact to these peope who use i watch or iphone because on my point of view they are stupid people.
and if apple does not chance their attitude this will stay this way.
Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
Originally posted by Dukenukemx
View Post
its already "beyond a web browser" but you fool want to believe that it is only some non-important web-browser technology...
but man thats YOUR problem not my one.
Leave a comment: