Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PostgreSQL 10.1 Released

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by uid313 View Post
    And it will clutter your system with dozens of executables in /bin or /usr/bin or /usr/sbin.
    It doesn't support the SQL/JSON standard.
    It has a weird, custom, vanity license instead of an established common open source license.
    Most likely does not support the SQL:2016 standard. Probably not even SQL:2011.
    Just wondering, as you are so quick to trash PGSQL, due to what-look-to-be-quite-funny-reasons, what exactly do you do with *your* database? How big is it?

    - Gilboa
    DEV: Intel S2600C0, 2xE52658V2, 32GB, 4x2TB + 2x3TB, GTX1080, F27/x86_64, Dell UP3216Q 4K.
    SRV: Intel S5520SC, 2xX5680, 36GB, 4x2TB, GTX550, F27/x86_64, Dell U2711..
    BACK: Tyan Tempest i5400XT, 2xE5335, 8GB, 3x1.5TB, 9800GTX, F27/x86-64.
    LAP: ASUS Strix GL502V, i7-6700HQ, 32GB, 1TB+256GB, 1070M, F27/x86_64.

    Comment


    • #12
      Hmm. is this a point release? Is the next one going to be 10.1.1 or 10.2? I've got a script that updates Postgres for my Gitlab installation and it checks to see if the minor version has changed and does a proper migration if it has. But if minor is the new patch number then I'll need to update it. Major.Minor.Patch

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by gilboa View Post

        Just wondering, as you are so quick to trash PGSQL, due to what-look-to-be-quite-funny-reasons, what exactly do you do with *your* database? How big is it?

        - Gilboa
        I am a developer, so I just develop stuff.
        I just mentioned the things I dislike about PostgreSQL. But as far as technology goes, I am sure it is a really great databases.
        I am sure it is fast, secure, reliable, well documented and feature rich. I am not saying it is a bad piece of software.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by uid313 View Post

          I am a developer, so I just develop stuff.
          I just mentioned the things I dislike about PostgreSQL. But as far as technology goes, I am sure it is a really great databases.
          I am sure it is fast, secure, reliable, well documented and feature rich. I am not saying it is a bad piece of software.
          OK. Thanks for the clarification.

          I should point out that as a very heavy PGSQL user (w/ 100+TB DBs) PGSQL is indeed one amazing piece of software.

          - Gilboa
          DEV: Intel S2600C0, 2xE52658V2, 32GB, 4x2TB + 2x3TB, GTX1080, F27/x86_64, Dell UP3216Q 4K.
          SRV: Intel S5520SC, 2xX5680, 36GB, 4x2TB, GTX550, F27/x86_64, Dell U2711..
          BACK: Tyan Tempest i5400XT, 2xE5335, 8GB, 3x1.5TB, 9800GTX, F27/x86-64.
          LAP: ASUS Strix GL502V, i7-6700HQ, 32GB, 1TB+256GB, 1070M, F27/x86_64.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by FireBurn View Post
            Hmm. is this a point release? Is the next one going to be 10.1.1 or 10.2? I've got a script that updates Postgres for my Gitlab installation and it checks to see if the minor version has changed and does a proper migration if it has. But if minor is the new patch number then I'll need to update it. Major.Minor.Patch
            Yes, it's the .1 patch version of the latest release, which is just version 10. They changed the numbering system.

            Comment

            Working...
            X