If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Even so, it's not postgresSQL... Though yeah, it's usually shortened as postgres, but that always, for some reason, hurt my ears.
And removing the 's' or capitalizing the 'g' hurts other peoples' ears, mostly those active in its community.
Besides, it's not a matter of blindly removing the 'SQL'. It's a matter of calling it by its current full 'PostgreSQL' name or its previous 'Postgres' name. Pick one of the already valid ones instead of hack'n'slashing one to your leisure.
There is the SQL/JSON standard, but unfortunately JSON support is implemented differently in Oracle, PostgreSQL and Microsoft SQL Server. 😥
I think Oracle is closest to the standard. PostgreSQL have JSON support, but it diverges from the standard. 😢
Actually, the implementation in Postgres is going to be fully compliant. But it didn't get merged into core in v10 because of timings. It will be in v11 and it's already available for v10 through Postgres Professional repositories.
Comment