im baffled by all this. So, was this Reiser guy basically framed for a crime he didnt commit? Who killed his wife then?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Linux Kernel SABOTEURS.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by xav1r View Postim baffled by all this. So, was this Reiser guy basically framed for a crime he didnt commit? Who killed his wife then?
Hans killed her and his crappy FS killed two of my HTPCs in the past.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vighy View PostIs the truht what really happened or just what we believe truth is?
You don't even have to know C that well to understand the small but deliberate changes (ie sabotage) to the source code that led to Reiser4 destroying its filesystem.
The sabotage to Reiser4 was really very obvious.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jade View PostYes it is really true.
You don't even have to know C that well to understand the small but deliberate changes (ie sabotage) to the source code that led to Reiser4 destroying its filesystem.
The sabotage to Reiser4 was really very obvious.
Knowing C may help me distinguish "sabotage" from "bug fixing", what you are not trying to do!
Remember that if "something works" it doesn't mean "it's right"!
Maybe reiser did mistakes writing the code; everybody (even the best programmers) make them! So, even if something works in some cases it may not work in all the cases. A better implementation could be even different.
Except if you really know what every single line of code of Reiser4 does, you should not base your sabotage theories on "lines swapped".
Ok, there may be breakage between the two different implementations, but Reiser4 is not in feature freeze! so breakage is likely to happen and you are advised that this could be dangerous for your data.
Comment
Comment