Originally posted by 3766691
View Post
actually I don't seem to "feel" no performance hit right now - at all
but the issue with tickless and high cpu-load still persists:
top - 01:42:04 up 1:13, 3 users, load average: 0.34, 0.97, 1.95
Tasks: 254 total, 1 running, 253 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 0.0 us, 0.1 sy, 0.4 ni, 99.4 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem: 8157664 total, 4885880 used, 3271784 free, 313284 buffers
KiB Swap: 9437180 total, 0 used, 9437180 free, 2880232 cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
26502 user 0 0 1358m 35m 21m S 165.7 0.4 16:02.70 audacious
6878 root 0 0 231m 85m 18m S 33.5 1.1 25:13.02 X
6464 root 0 0 16032 1700 292 S 19.6 0.0 2:08.18 irqbalance
6997 user 0 0 21328 1832 608 S 14.9 0.0 1:36.40 dbus-daemon
20553 user 0 0 2636m 162m 17m S 12.9 2.0 8:54.44 PDFXCview.exe
7193 user 0 0 4253m 291m 53m S 12.3 3.7 26:27.91 chrome
20562 user 26 0 12016 8876 1168 S 12.3 0.1 4:25.59 wineserver
7082 user 0 0 264m 23m 10m S 9.0 0.3 3:46.58 applet.py
30336 user 0 5 1236m 60m 22m S 8.6 0.8 2:05.95 CrRendererMain
7236 user 0 0 1213m 41m 17m S 7.6 0.5 1:12.04 CrRendererMain
7073 user 0 -11 429m 8872 6092 S 5.0 0.1 2:35.60 pulseaudio
7408 user 0 0 1413m 41m 25m S 2.0 0.5 3:56.38 nautilus
22935 root 23 0 40652 1756 1184 R 2.0 0.0 0:01.21 top
Tasks: 254 total, 1 running, 253 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 0.0 us, 0.1 sy, 0.4 ni, 99.4 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem: 8157664 total, 4885880 used, 3271784 free, 313284 buffers
KiB Swap: 9437180 total, 0 used, 9437180 free, 2880232 cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
26502 user 0 0 1358m 35m 21m S 165.7 0.4 16:02.70 audacious
6878 root 0 0 231m 85m 18m S 33.5 1.1 25:13.02 X
6464 root 0 0 16032 1700 292 S 19.6 0.0 2:08.18 irqbalance
6997 user 0 0 21328 1832 608 S 14.9 0.0 1:36.40 dbus-daemon
20553 user 0 0 2636m 162m 17m S 12.9 2.0 8:54.44 PDFXCview.exe
7193 user 0 0 4253m 291m 53m S 12.3 3.7 26:27.91 chrome
20562 user 26 0 12016 8876 1168 S 12.3 0.1 4:25.59 wineserver
7082 user 0 0 264m 23m 10m S 9.0 0.3 3:46.58 applet.py
30336 user 0 5 1236m 60m 22m S 8.6 0.8 2:05.95 CrRendererMain
7236 user 0 0 1213m 41m 17m S 7.6 0.5 1:12.04 CrRendererMain
7073 user 0 -11 429m 8872 6092 S 5.0 0.1 2:35.60 pulseaudio
7408 user 0 0 1413m 41m 25m S 2.0 0.5 3:56.38 nautilus
22935 root 23 0 40652 1756 1184 R 2.0 0.0 0:01.21 top
in a few days I'll see how this affects battery life on the notebook
is there much improvement in battery consumption with tickless (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
compared to with ticks ?
Comment