3.3.5 with RIFS
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The v2 Rotary Interactivity Favor Scheduler
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Naib View Post3.3.5 with RIFS
my sucky Android duplicate my messageLast edited by 3766691; 15 May 2012, 10:19 AM.
Comment
-
-
It was me I had conflicting patches. Applied to vanilla 3.3.5 worked. It seems snappier, but that can also be placebo, I'll have to test some more. I also notice the lag when switching between apps, but I guess being snappy everywhere all the time is kind of utopic, no?
Time to compile pacworld
Comment
-
Originally posted by elmariachi View PostIt was me I had conflicting patches. Applied to vanilla 3.3.5 worked. It seems snappier, but that can also be placebo, I'll have to test some more. I also notice the lag when switching between apps, but I guess being snappy everywhere all the time is kind of utopic, no?
Time to compile pacworld
Thanks for giving comment. The reason why it performs snappier is because it don't use complex and unaccurate algorithum to give priority to interactive task.
I 'm going to try using the algorithum RIFS has used and EEVDF to priovide a more fairer scheduling. The switches between user-interactive task is smoother than BFS with high workload. It seems lag when switching to a cpu intensive task from interactive task. ;-)Last edited by 3766691; 16 May 2012, 10:00 AM.
Comment
-
Are you the main author of RIFS?
forgot to say: I'm using it with deadline, it seems to be faster than BFQ or CFQ. Noop and deadline are faster for me (normal hdd, non-sdd)
funny thing: governor set to performance, no dyn ticks, nothing to save energy on, and I get almost exactly the same temperature as with BFS with everything on "eco" mode... maybe it's not the scheduler, but it's funnyLast edited by elmariachi; 16 May 2012, 03:11 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by elmariachi View PostAre you the main author of RIFS?
forgot to say: I'm using it with deadline, it seems to be faster than BFQ or CFQ. Noop and deadline are faster for me (normal hdd, non-sdd)
Originally posted by elmariachi View Postfunny thing: governor set to performance, no dyn ticks, nothing to save energy on, and I get almost exactly the same temperature as with BFS with everything on "eco" mode... maybe it's not the scheduler, but it's funny
Also, RIFS handles interactivity better than BFS with high workload. You can just try make -j128 and play your music or browse webpage with Firefox. According to my test result, 3.3.1 with BFS hanged my box with make -j512, and the music stopped for more than 1 minute, but with BFS it won't.
Comment
Comment