In most case for this seller, not only is he not giving any mention of the developper or license of the software, but he is also deliberately hiding the original product's name.
For me the "ethical" way would be at least to mention the license of the product and how much of the selling price would be given as support to the original project when paying more than the cost of the distribution itself. As an exemple, http://www.osdisc.com is dealing with selling open source software way better.
I also feel suspiscious about the high rating of this seller as most of the comments are too short, not descriptive at all and very repetitive.
For me the "ethical" way would be at least to mention the license of the product and how much of the selling price would be given as support to the original project when paying more than the cost of the distribution itself. As an exemple, http://www.osdisc.com is dealing with selling open source software way better.
I also feel suspiscious about the high rating of this seller as most of the comments are too short, not descriptive at all and very repetitive.
Comment