Why would you want to run a fast filesystem? I dont get it.
The most important thing for a filesystem is data integrity. Is your data safe and protected on disk? With XFS, the answer is no.
A researcher shows that:
"XFS, NTFS, ext3, ReiserFS and JFS have. . . failure policies that are often inconsistent, sometimes buggy, and generally inadequate in their ability to recover from partial disk failures."
I would not want to put my data on a fast, but not reliable storage solution. Data safety is the most important for me. Not speed.
The most important thing for a filesystem is data integrity. Is your data safe and protected on disk? With XFS, the answer is no.
A researcher shows that:
"XFS, NTFS, ext3, ReiserFS and JFS have. . . failure policies that are often inconsistent, sometimes buggy, and generally inadequate in their ability to recover from partial disk failures."
I would not want to put my data on a fast, but not reliable storage solution. Data safety is the most important for me. Not speed.
Comment