Originally posted by L33F3R
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Adobe Rants Over Linux Video Acceleration APIs
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by deanjo View Postlol, honestly I don't have an issue at all if people/corporation/etc say "If you don't charge for our implementation of xyz then we won't charge you." that is their prerogative. It's their IP they should be able to do what ever they want with it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlackStar View PostThat's what they did with MP3 too, and once it became so entrenched that noone could live without it they started charging an arm and a leg.
A typical marketing ploy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Apopas View PostYou don't, I do. Their IP, their problem. I don't want to have any relations with them and because of that I don't want they to have any relations with me and ofcourse to be enforced to use their software as well. Fair is fair.
Comment
-
Originally posted by deanjo View PostSure you always have that freedom, but so do the service providers. You want to use their service then you play with their partners.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RealNC View PostAnd btw, where's Dirac here? It's supposed to beat Theora and be almost on par with H.264. And it's both Free and Open.
Comment
-
Originally posted by deanjo View PostLawyers don't like hearing "The short answer is that we don't know for certain, but we're pretty sure we don't. ".
Originally posted by MPEG LANo assurance is or can be made that the License includes every essential patent. The purpose of the License is to offer a convenient licensing alternative to everyone on the same terms and to include as much essential intellectual property as possible for their convenience.
Comment
Comment