Originally posted by Quackdoc
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rust-Written Coreutils 0.0.25 With Improved GNU Compatibility
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by imaami View Post
Dynamic linking would actually save space while also not being a toolchain-wide regression of comical proportions.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Blademasterz View PostThe downside of rust and rust programs for me is the compile time even for a simple programs it takes twice or even 3 times longer than C++ written porgrams
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by bug77 View Post
Newsflash: the borrow checker actually has work to do.
Rust compilation times is an ongoing topic that generates many discussions online1. Most people don’t really care about what exactly takes time when compiling Rust program; they just want it to be faster in general. But sometimes, you can see people pointing fingers at specific culprits, like LLVM or the borrow checker. In this post, I’ll try to examine who is the culprit in various situations, based on data gathered from a fun little experiment. Probably also offline. ↩
Contrary to a popular misconception, it's apparently not the borrow checker (or the other static checks) that takes so much time, it's the codegen.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by brad0 View Post
C++ is already painfully slow enough as it is to compile. That is pretty awful.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment