Originally posted by sophisticles
View Post
Take shells for example. They weren't new in general but Linux made a large number of people aware of how useful they are.
They got emulated in Windows, e.g. cygwin, came to Apple when they switched to macOS and now are even natively available on Windows, e.g. Powershell.
At some point Nero-burning-ROM was the app for burning CDROMs and DVDs but quickly other applications became available as alternatives.
When the company tried to expand onto other platforms they found that competitors had already capture so much market share that it was very difficult to even get a foothold, let alone taking over.
Apple released iTunes for other platforms because they deemed it more important to push the iPod and their store than to push macOS or hardware sales.
Originally posted by sophisticles
View Post
SUSE's Yast, for example. Totally unmatched at the time of its introduction but other distributions came up with their own tools fairly quickly.
Ubuntu tried several times but more of then not the others caught up or went even beyond.
Having a head start is nice but keeping ahead is costly, especially when an open competitor can draw more resources due to team work.
Originally posted by sophisticles
View Post
They have some KDE branded models as incentive to buy for fans of KDE software.
KDE is essentially a software vendor. Like any other software vendor they want their target market to be as wide as possible.
Comment