Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Systemd 246 Is On The Way With Many Changes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by areilly View Post
    I'm sure it's just a matter of learning the new thing, but I have the opposite experience. I have Ubuntu 20.04 Multipass on my mac (just to play around with) and have yet to get the DNS or several other parts of the networking to even remotely work, and I don't have time to figure it all out.
    that's ubuntu's fault, because for my distro everything works out of the box
    Last edited by pal666; 07-04-2020, 07:44 AM.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by andyprough View Post
      I wish this particular piece of FUD would die one of these days.
      i wish morons like you would grow some brains
      Originally posted by andyprough View Post
      A sysvinit based slackware setup with all its scripts is exponentially more stable than any of the current top 5 most popular systemd distros.
      in biology "stable" means "dead". just like your slackware setup

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by BenjiWiebe View Post
        I should have made myself more clear about what I meant by the Unix way. The idea of one tool to do one task, and do it well. Systemd definitely does not focus on one small task.
        you definitely have no clue about systemd. systemd matches your unix way definition exactly. it's a collection of tools each doing one task well. what makes you think lines of shell script constitute separate tools but lines of unit file don't?

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by andyprough View Post
          I have never once chosen to use systemd, as sysvinit exceeds my expectations, and I wish to avoid certain system stability problems common when running systemd.
          lol, you have very low expectations and broken system, on which systemd has some stability problems. maybe it's time to stop breaking your systems?

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by andyprough View Post
            You've never seen the boot screen for MX? https://trisquel.info/files/Screenshot-4_0.png
            Really works, exactly as I described. Very stable, and fast.
            liar, you described it as having stability issues with systemd. my distro indeed very stable and fast. and not "very stable with systemd stability issues" like your shit

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by k1e0x View Post
              The reason people say that is because the philosophy is for a program to be small, do one thing and do it well. Systemd does not fit that description
              only for imbeciles confusing systemd project with systemd program
              Originally posted by k1e0x View Post
              Systemd is anything but simple too
              for imbeciles - sure
              Originally posted by k1e0x View Post
              if you want honest to god simple try real Unix like FreeBSD
              moron, freebsd is one project just like systemd. if freebsd is "simple and does one thing" than systemd is even simpler and has smaller scope
              Originally posted by k1e0x View Post
              For example: perhaps you need a NTP server. The box's entire purpose in life is to run ntp and nothing else. systemd seems overly complex
              only for moron who can't compare freebsd to systemd and understand that freebsd is much more complex than systemd
              Originally posted by k1e0x View Post
              it will take less than an hour to setup
              i forgot when was last time when new linux box setup required more than 10 minutes of wall clock time(my time is even less)

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by pal666 View Post
                there exactly two such imbeciles in addition to you as of now
                . lol .

                Comment

                Working...
                X