Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Systemd 246 Is On The Way With Many Changes
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by BenjiWiebe View PostI should have made myself more clear about what I meant by the Unix way. The idea of one tool to do one task, and do it well. Systemd definitely does not focus on one small task.
Comment
-
Originally posted by andyprough View PostI have never once chosen to use systemd, as sysvinit exceeds my expectations, and I wish to avoid certain system stability problems common when running systemd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by andyprough View PostYou've never seen the boot screen for MX? https://trisquel.info/files/Screenshot-4_0.png
Really works, exactly as I described. Very stable, and fast.
Comment
-
Originally posted by k1e0x View PostThe reason people say that is because the philosophy is for a program to be small, do one thing and do it well. Systemd does not fit that description
Originally posted by k1e0x View PostSystemd is anything but simple too
Originally posted by k1e0x View Postif you want honest to god simple try real Unix like FreeBSD
Originally posted by k1e0x View PostFor example: perhaps you need a NTP server. The box's entire purpose in life is to run ntp and nothing else. systemd seems overly complex
Originally posted by k1e0x View Postit will take less than an hour to setup
Comment
Comment