You should check this:
It's the kernel taking too much time for itself?
Try with PowerTOP and the tell me. I've always get 25% of CPU when doing nothing.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ubuntu 7.04 to 8.10 Benchmarks: Is Ubuntu Getting Slower?
Collapse
X
-
Linux I barely see Fps higher than 55 playing with Low/Normal settings, dropping to their 30s or even 20s most of the time (sometimes in heavy shootings indoor their 10s!), even with small shootings outdoor; the difference is very noticeable, I can assure you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ebird View PostHave you some data? Is it like 80 -> 40 or 80 -> 70 ?
That's another thing. Intrepid is using the xorg 1.5 server. The driver should be nearby beta status. Perhaps there are some more fixes in the official driver?
while in Windows I play nicely at highest settings with 60 fps average (frames locked and vsync on, so maybe I could see even more Fps) while using Linux I barely see Fps higher than 55 playing with Low/Normal settings, dropping to their 30s or even 20s most of the time (sometimes in heavy shootings indoor their 10s!), even with small shootings outdoor; the difference is very noticeable, I can assure you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Kano View Post@Beleriand
You are testing different Nvidia drivers, best use my script:
By the way these are my
To be fair you should acknowledge, that code optimization is the attention getter of compilation and not the compilation itself. That may cause the time needed in these tests grows over the distro versions. Maybe the code is faster then, which unfortunately can't be proofed with the suite. Would be a good idea too, wouldn't it?
Leave a comment:
-
@Beleriand
You are testing different Nvidia drivers, best use my script:
To install always the latest (177.80 currently) driver on every distro. I optimized the script that it should work without problems with 32+64 bit Ubuntu 8.10 (in case of 8.10 it has to enable multiverse too).
Leave a comment:
-
This is all just a trick to get us to use Phoronix's benchmarking tool and prove them wrong.
Leave a comment:
-
I also have 2 more tests (see my post on page 8 for more).
computational
gtkperf TotalTime
As you might criticize, theres some difference in screen resolutions.
This should not affect the computational result but maybe the gtkperf a bit. I will proof later that its not a big issue.
Furthermore I re-emphasize that I believe that something went wrong with the Phoronix test on audio-encoding. I wait in suspense for results on ohter platforms.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm currently running the audio-enconding tests of the test suite on a Thinkpad R31 (P-3 1GHz, 512MB RAM) on Ubuntu 8.10 and the tests that are finished (LAME, OGG, FLAC) are only ~10% lower than the numbers Phoronix got for their T60.
The T60 has a Core2Duo with 1.87Ghz, it should be twice as fast as a P-3 with 1GHz. Remember the scores for the audio-tests are in seconds!
Code:R31 T60 LAME 133.07s 120.83s OGG 84.40s 69.81s FLAC 62.13s 56.19s
P.S :
I will upload the complete results when the tests are finished and post the link here in the forum.
Edit :
The complete results can be found here :
http://global.phoronix-test-suite.co...14-14176-26881Last edited by glasen; 31 October 2008, 09:34 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
I would be interested to see a benchmark comparison between Ubuntu and Debian. There is no question that Debian runs lighter and faster than Ubuntu. This would be the litmus test for just how bloated Ubuntu really is.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: