Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Future Of Android-x86 Is In Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by droidhacker View Post

    Funny how my 2.5 year old Nexus 6 (Snapdragon 805) is orders of magnitude more powerful than, say, an Intel C3230.
    Both are 4-core 28 nm... the Snapdragon is a 32bit part, the C3230 is a 64bit part.
    Which Android benchmark you took as a base for evaluation? I'd be interested to compare my Galaxy S7 (8-core Exynos 8890) against Intel P8600 (mobile Core2 Duo) using the same benchmark. Clocks are roughly same - 2,4GHz for Intel x86 and 2,6GHz for Samsung's ARM. I have one old Intel based laptop atm standing idle which can run Android-x86 and has P8600 in it.

    I shall also post results here.

    Comment


    • #22
      Antutu 3D benchmark results.
      Samsung Galaxy S7 smartphone.
      3D:46657
      UX:43329
      CPU:34468
      RAM:9867

      Dell Latitude E6400
      3D:1187
      UX:23598
      CPU:34614
      RAM:7222

      Both machines were running 64bit Marshmallow. As you can see, ancient Core 2 Duo is on par with Exynos 8890 octa-core in raw number crunching. Although, Exynos octa-core is actually 4+4, ARMv8-A and Cortex A53,according to specs one was running from 2,3-2,6GHz and the other max 1,6GHz.
      Rest of the tests were what I pretty much expected. Intel 4500 Express is pretty weak IGP, RAM was LPDDR4 vs DDR2, UX had probably an issue of "translation layer" ("native bridge" option in Android-x86) from ARM-"speak" to x86-"speak".

      When I have the time, I'll try same on some newer laptop sporting Radeon APU.
      Last edited by aht0; 14 February 2017, 07:43 AM.

      Comment

      Working...
      X